X-Recipient:	archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
X-SWARE-Spam-Status:	No, hits=3.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_SORBS_DUL,RDNS_DYNAMIC,TVD_RCVD_IP
X-Spam-Check-By:	sourceware.org
From:	"Jan Alphenaar" <jan DOT alphenaar AT dotcolour DOT com>
To:	<cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
Subject:	FW: Rsync question on version 3.0.4
Date:	Sat, 23 May 2009 23:29:36 +0200
Message-ID:	<4DE96E796DB0449899E072E5B8C6E0DE@napoleon>
MIME-Version:	1.0
X-IsSubscribed:	yes
Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id:	<cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

FYI

-----Oorspronkelijk bericht-----
Van: Jan Alphenaar [mailto:jan DOT alphenaar AT dotcolour DOT com]=20
Verzonden: zaterdag 23 mei 2009 20:18
Aan: 'Lapo Luchini'
Onderwerp: RE: Rsync question on version 3.0.4

Hi Lapo,

Thanks for giving an answer.

Without the -p option the rights on the directory on my local PC look prett=
y strange to me (000). Too bad I was looking to this directory with Windows=
 Explorer only and not with a CygWin window, otherwise I could have figured=
 this out myself...
=20
With the -p option the rights come from the serverside, which is better. It=
 now seems to work correctly

Thanks a lot for helping me out.

Regards,

Jan

-----Oorspronkelijk bericht-----
Van: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com [mailto:cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com] Namens Lapo L=
uchini
Verzonden: zaterdag 23 mei 2009 13:31
Aan: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Onderwerp: Re: Rsync question on version 3.0.4

Jan Alphenaar wrote:
> When I copy over a directory from my server to my local pc with rsync, it=
 is
> not possible to open the local directory

Do you mean the origin has 644 files and the destination has 000 file
permissions?

Also as you're not using -p the destination file permission are not
copied from the origin ones:

  When this option is off, permissions are set as follows:

  o  Existing files (including updated files) retain their existing
     permissions, though the =E2=88=92=E2=88=92executability option might c=
hange just
     the execute permission for the file.

  o  New files get their =E2=80=9Cnormal=E2=80=9D permission bits set to th=
e source
     file=E2=80=99s permissions masked with the receiving directory=E2=80=
=99s default
     permissions (either the receiving process=E2=80=99s umask, or the
     permissions specified via the destination directory=E2=80=99s default =
ACL),
     and their special permission bits disabled except in the case where
     a new directory inherits a setgid bit from its parent directory.

--=20
Lapo Luchini - http://lapo.it/


--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/



--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -