delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi   search  
Mail Archives: cygwin/2009/05/21/00:31:25

X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_HELO_PASS
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Message-ID: <4A14D846.3050505@cygwin.com>
Date: Thu, 21 May 2009 00:27:50 -0400
From: "Larry Hall (Cygwin)" <reply-to-list-only-lh AT cygwin DOT com>
Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.8.1.21) Gecko/20090320 Remi/2.0.0.21-1.fc8.remi Lightning/0.9 Thunderbird/2.0.0.21 Mnenhy/0.7.5.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject: Re: file execute access with noacl mount with Cygwin-1.7.0 20090518 snapshot
References: <COL102-W652563D05A10246186BB68B5590 AT phx DOT gbl> <COL102-W2723FB5BB4899C3D53F3A8B5590 AT phx DOT gbl>
In-Reply-To: <COL102-W2723FB5BB4899C3D53F3A8B5590@phx.gbl>
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id: <cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

Karl M wrote:
> Karl M wrote:
>> Hi All...
>>
>> I just tried executing a file on my desktop as
>> /c/Users/me/Desktop/file.exe in Vista Business SP1.
>> 
>> The file would not tab complete in bash and an ls -al showed no execute
>> access.
>> 
>> Do I need to add the exec or cygexec explicitly, or should that be the
>> default with noacl?
>> Thanks,
>>
>> ...Karl
>>
> I'm ok with adding it explicitly, and perhaps that is cleaner in the long
> run with no hidden assumptions.
> 
> It is just that my file ended in .exe and the documentation says:
> 
> While normally the execute permission bits are used to evaluate
> executability, this is not possible on filesystems which don't support
> permissions at all (like FAT/FAT32), or if ACLs are ignored on filesystems
> supporting them (see the aforementioned acl mount option). In these cases,
> the following heuristic is used to evaluate if a file is executable: Files
> ending in certain extensions (.exe, .com, .bat, .btm, .cmd) are assumed to
> be executable.
>  
> So the current behavior is not what I expected.

Does 'file.exe' report itself as executable if you move it to somewhere
that's not under '/c/Users/'?  Is there a reason you don't want 'acl'
(other than the fact that you're working under '/c/Users' on Vista)?
While setting 'exec' or 'cygexec' may help in your situation, I'm not at
all clear why you think it's 'cleaner'.  Perhaps you could be more explicit.
See <http://cygwin.com/problems.html> for guidelines on providing a
complete problem report, which might help us all understand the heart of
your question.

-- 
Larry Hall                              http://www.rfk.com
RFK Partners, Inc.                      (508) 893-9779 - RFK Office
216 Dalton Rd.                          (508) 893-9889 - FAX
Holliston, MA 01746

_____________________________________________________________________

A: Yes.
 > Q: Are you sure?
 >> A: Because it reverses the logical flow of conversation.
 >>> Q: Why is top posting annoying in email?

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -


  webmaster     delorie software   privacy  
  Copyright © 2019   by DJ Delorie     Updated Jul 2019