delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
X-Recipient: | archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com |
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: | No, hits=-0.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,RCVD_NUMERIC_HELO,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS |
X-Spam-Check-By: | sourceware.org |
To: | cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
From: | Lenik <lenik AT bodz DOT net> |
Subject: | Re: expr error |
Date: | Mon, 18 May 2009 09:23:31 +0800 |
Lines: | 51 |
Message-ID: | <guqdaj$9fp$1@ger.gmane.org> |
References: | <gup17t$qp2$1 AT ger DOT gmane DOT org> <4A1024F1 DOT 4000102 AT byu DOT net> <guq3mh$n5v$1 AT ger DOT gmane DOT org> <4A10A0E2 DOT 803 AT gmail DOT com> |
Mime-Version: | 1.0 |
User-Agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.1b3pre) Gecko/20090223 Thunderbird/3.0b2 |
In-Reply-To: | <4A10A0E2.803@gmail.com> |
X-IsSubscribed: | yes |
Mailing-List: | contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm |
List-Id: | <cygwin.cygwin.com> |
List-Unsubscribe: | <mailto:cygwin-unsubscribe-archive-cygwin=delorie DOT com AT cygwin DOT com> |
List-Subscribe: | <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com> |
List-Archive: | <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/> |
List-Post: | <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com> |
List-Help: | <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs> |
Sender: | cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com |
Mail-Followup-To: | cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
Delivered-To: | mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
On 2009-5-18 7:42, Dave Korn wrote: > Lenik wrote: > >>> Are you sure you don't have some competing tools getting in the way of >>> proper cygwin operation? >>> >> No, I've set PATH to cygwin/bin only, before execute expr. > > Doesn't necessarily mean there aren't system-wide hooks being loaded into > every application running. > This is hard to say, but I think my system is ok, all tools in coreutils except expr are ok to run. >> stackdump added. > > Can you get this to reproduce under GDB? A backtrace from the exception > caught there, plus the output from "info files", would tell us more. From the > tiny bit of stackdump it managed to output before crashing, it does look like > either the stack is very corrupted, or the program counter ended up in a > rather unexpected area of memory owing to some intercepting DLL or similar. > I don't know how to do in detail, this is what I get, I don't have debug symbols. (gdb) run Starting program: /usr/bin/expr [New thread 3988.0xd84] (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) [New thread 3988.0x9f4] (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) (no debugging symbols found) Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault. 0x05240000 in ?? () (gdb) Thanks, Lenik -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |