X-Recipient:	archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
X-SWARE-Spam-Status:	No, hits=-2.2 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_NEUTRAL
X-Spam-Check-By:	sourceware.org
Message-ID:	<4A087E2B.7080807@cornell.edu>
Date:	Mon, 11 May 2009 15:36:11 -0400
From:	Ken Brown <kbrown AT cornell DOT edu>
User-Agent:	Thunderbird 2.0.0.21 (Windows/20090302)
MIME-Version:	1.0
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: icu-3.8-5 patches
References:	<4A01FD39 DOT 8060001 AT cornell DOT edu> <4A08789A DOT 1000804 AT x-ray DOT at>
In-Reply-To:	<4A08789A.1000804@x-ray.at>
X-IsSubscribed:	yes
Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id:	<cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

On 5/11/2009 3:12 PM, Reini Urban wrote:
> Ken Brown schrieb:
>> There is some overlap between the successfully applied patches and 
>> those in icu-3.8-5.src.patch, but I don't think either set of patches 
>> contains the other.  Can someone clarify for me what the actual source 
>> patches should be?
> 
> This is easy:
> icu-3.8-5.src.patch already contains the two extra patches.

Not quite.  It doesn't contain the patches to i18n/regexcmp.cpp and 
i18n/rematch.cpp.  That's part of what confused me.  Anyway, I think 
I've got it all sorted out now except for the question I asked in

	http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2009-05/msg00292.html

Thanks.

Ken

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -