X-Recipient:	archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
X-SWARE-Spam-Status:	No, hits=-2.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_PASS
X-Spam-Check-By:	sourceware.org
Message-ID:	<49FEEE8F.3020100@gmail.com>
Date:	Mon, 04 May 2009 14:33:03 +0100
From:	Dave Korn <dave DOT korn DOT cygwin AT googlemail DOT com>
User-Agent:	Thunderbird 2.0.0.17 (Windows/20080914)
MIME-Version:	1.0
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: [1.7] Weird error "grep: writing output: Cannot allocate memory"
References:	<49FB714A DOT 4010002 AT gmail DOT com> <20090504033921 DOT GA6162 AT ednor DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx> <20090504035236 DOT GA11270 AT ednor DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx>
In-Reply-To:	<20090504035236.GA11270@ednor.casa.cgf.cx>
Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id:	<cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

Christopher Faylor wrote:
> On Sun, May 03, 2009 at 11:39:21PM -0400, Christopher Faylor wrote:
>> On Fri, May 01, 2009 at 11:01:46PM +0100, Dave Korn wrote:

>>>  The attached STC reproduces the problem, and apparently:
>>>
>>> gcc-3 -mno-cygwin stc.c -o stc -W -Wall -g -O0 -o stc-mingw.exe
>>>
>>> gcc-4 stc.c -o stc -W -Wall -g -O0
>>>
>>> .. it is cygwin independent, since both executables produce similar results:
>> A test case which demonstrates a failing Windows call fail isn't really
>> interesting as far as Cygwin is concerned.  

  Well, just to state the obvious, Cygwin itself is written using Windows
calls, and if they are prone to fail it needs to be written to take that into
account.  As I guess you reached the similar conclusion.

> Do you have a stc which fails using Cygwin's API?

  I should be able to generate one.

> I made some changes to Cygwin's always-burgeoning console code which limit
> the number of characters transferred to the console.  Could you check if
> it still fails with these changes?

  I'll get to this during today, thanks.

    cheers,
      DaveK


--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -