delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
X-Recipient: | archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com |
X-Spam-Check-By: | sourceware.org |
Date: | Mon, 4 May 2009 01:04:22 -0400 |
From: | Christopher Faylor <cgf-use-the-mailinglist-please AT cygwin DOT com> |
To: | cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
Subject: | Re: [1.7] packaging problem? Both /usr/bin/ and /usr/lib/ are non-empty |
Message-ID: | <20090504050422.GA4733@ednor.casa.cgf.cx> |
Reply-To: | cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
Mail-Followup-To: | cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
References: | <49FE746E DOT 2080409 AT bonhard DOT uklinux DOT net> |
MIME-Version: | 1.0 |
In-Reply-To: | <49FE746E.2080409@bonhard.uklinux.net> |
User-Agent: | Mutt/1.5.16 (2007-06-09) |
Mailing-List: | contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm |
List-Id: | <cygwin.cygwin.com> |
List-Unsubscribe: | <mailto:cygwin-unsubscribe-archive-cygwin=delorie DOT com AT cygwin DOT com> |
List-Subscribe: | <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com> |
List-Archive: | <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/> |
List-Post: | <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com> |
List-Help: | <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs> |
Sender: | cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com |
Mail-Followup-To: | cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
Delivered-To: | mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
On Mon, May 04, 2009 at 05:51:58AM +0100, Fergus wrote: > >>Just noticed that after the recent unison upgrade there exists a file > >> /usr/bin/unison > >>Also just noticed (but this must have occurred a while ago - 30/03/09 > >>maybe, the date of a TeX upgrade?) that there now exists a directory > >> /usr/lib/texmf/ > >>with deep non-empty subdirectory structure. Is it the case for [1.7] > >>that both /usr/bin/ and /usr/lib/ should be empty as for [1.5]? > >> > >>Possibly the texmf/ packaging issue has been corrected in subsequent > >>upgrades and so /usr/lib/texmf/ can be deleted without compromising > >>functionality; but I think the appearance of /usr/bin/unison is very > >>new. > > >How about humoring our need for details by providing cygcheck output > >as mentioned at http://cygwin.com/problems.html ? > > Sorry. Attached. For the future: there's no need to bzip the attachment. That makes it harder to read. -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |