X-Recipient:	archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
X-SWARE-Spam-Status:	No, hits=-2.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_PASS
X-Spam-Check-By:	sourceware.org
Message-ID:	<49FB6796.8000209@gmail.com>
Date:	Fri, 01 May 2009 22:20:22 +0100
From:	Dave Korn <dave DOT korn DOT cygwin AT googlemail DOT com>
User-Agent:	Thunderbird 2.0.0.17 (Windows/20080914)
MIME-Version:	1.0
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: [1.5] v. [1.7] unison: version clash?
References:	<49FB47AE DOT 3010401 AT bonhard DOT uklinux DOT net> <g3imv4l6pplfoop53pt9d6jbvppluvm601 AT 4ax DOT com> <20090501191256 DOT GE11295 AT ednor DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx> <49FB5F2B DOT 1080400 AT gmail DOT com> <f60fe000905011400s7b05f610xe907e376d9d6b2fc AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
In-Reply-To:	<f60fe000905011400s7b05f610xe907e376d9d6b2fc@mail.gmail.com>
Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id:	<cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

Mark J. Reed wrote:
> On Fri, May 1, 2009 at 4:44 PM, Dave Korn  wrote:
>>  I must be feeling a little "special" today.  Why should there be any
>> relationship between 1.5 package numbers and 1.7 package numbers?
> 
> I think that traditionally, if you found two Cygwin packages in the
> wild without any other context, and they had the same filename, they
> were ipso facto the same package.  Unless someone messed up somewhere.

  But that was before there were two Cygwin versions.

> Here we have two packages with the same filename that are not in fact
> the same package.  Ergo, someone messed up somewhere. :)

  But they exist in entirely separate name spaces, don't they?  How could the
similarity or difference of the names actually lead to anything going wrong in
practice, unless you're in the habit of casually pulling tarballs out of your
local package dir and manually installing them?

    cheers,
      DaveK


--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -