delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
X-Recipient: | archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com |
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: | No, hits=-2.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_PASS |
X-Spam-Check-By: | sourceware.org |
Message-ID: | <49FB5F2B.1080400@gmail.com> |
Date: | Fri, 01 May 2009 21:44:27 +0100 |
From: | Dave Korn <dave DOT korn DOT cygwin AT googlemail DOT com> |
User-Agent: | Thunderbird 2.0.0.17 (Windows/20080914) |
MIME-Version: | 1.0 |
To: | cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
Subject: | Re: [1.5] v. [1.7] unison: version clash? |
References: | <49FB47AE DOT 3010401 AT bonhard DOT uklinux DOT net> <g3imv4l6pplfoop53pt9d6jbvppluvm601 AT 4ax DOT com> <20090501191256 DOT GE11295 AT ednor DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx> |
In-Reply-To: | <20090501191256.GE11295@ednor.casa.cgf.cx> |
Mailing-List: | contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm |
List-Id: | <cygwin.cygwin.com> |
List-Subscribe: | <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com> |
List-Archive: | <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/> |
List-Post: | <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com> |
List-Help: | <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs> |
Sender: | cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com |
Mail-Followup-To: | cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
Delivered-To: | mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
Christopher Faylor wrote: > On Fri, May 01, 2009 at 03:09:04PM -0400, Andrew Schulman wrote: >>> I know they are downloaded from different directories release/ and release-2/ and installed into different versions of Cygwin [1.5] and [1.7] but up to now different package versions have always had different version numbers. >>> With the most recent update of unison this convention has been broken: >>> If the "convention" identified above is real and intended (which I hope it is) please could the version numbering for this latest installation of unison be corrected to adhere to it? >> Fergus, you're right. Sorry, I forgot about that. Friggin PITA, packaging >> for 1.5 and 1.7... > > Doh. I forgot too. I should have noticed this when I uploaded. I must be feeling a little "special" today. Why should there be any relationship between 1.5 package numbers and 1.7 package numbers? cheers, DaveK -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |