X-Recipient:	archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
X-SWARE-Spam-Status:	No, hits=-2.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_PASS
X-Spam-Check-By:	sourceware.org
Message-ID:	<49F76276.7010101@gmail.com>
Date:	Wed, 29 Apr 2009 06:09:26 +1000
From:	David Billinghurst <dbcygwin AT gmail DOT com>
User-Agent:	Thunderbird 2.0.0.21 (Windows/20090302)
MIME-Version:	1.0
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: Should gcc -p work?
References:	<49F707F4 DOT 6050004 AT gmail DOT com> <49F70CD6 DOT 6030908 AT sbcglobal DOT net>
In-Reply-To:	<49F70CD6.6030908@sbcglobal.net>
X-IsSubscribed:	yes
Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id:	<cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

Greg Chicares wrote:
> On 2009-04-28 13:43Z, David Billinghurst wrote:
>> I am looking into some gcc-4.{4,5}testsuite failures on cygwin.  Test 
>> gcc.dg/20021014-1.c, with CFLAGS="-O2 -p", fails due to undefined 
>> references to _mcount and __monstartup.  I get the same result with 
>> gcc-3.4.4 and gcc-4.3.2.  If this is expected then I will submit a gcc 
>> testsuite patch to skip this test.
 >
> Does it work with '-pg' but fail with '-p'?

Yes

> Perhaps this is related:
>   http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2008-02/msg01131.html

Yes.  I was going to do something similar.

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -