X-Recipient:	archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
X-SWARE-Spam-Status:	No, hits=-2.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS
X-Spam-Check-By:	sourceware.org
Message-ID:	<49DE79A0.70204@panix.com>
Date:	Thu, 09 Apr 2009 15:41:36 -0700
From:	"David M. Besonen" <davidb AT panix DOT com>
User-Agent:	Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8.1.16) Gecko/20080708 Thunderbird/2.0.0.16 Mnenhy/0.7.5.666
MIME-Version:	1.0
To:	cygwin users <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
Subject:	Re: rsnapshot
References:	<49DCF6D2 DOT 9070402 AT panix DOT com>
In-Reply-To:	<49DCF6D2.9070402@panix.com>
X-IsSubscribed:	yes
Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id:	<cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

On 4/8/2009 12:11 PM, David M. Besonen wrote:

> is anyone using rsnapshot regularly?  and if so, are there
> any caveats when using it under cygwin?

ping.

sorry to be impatient.  i'm pretty sure rsnapshot running
under cygwin is the best solution for an immediate need i have.

i do understand the limited path issue (that will be resolved
with cygwin 1.7).  since i'm about to deploy this as a last
minute solution into an environment i'd prefer not to modify
after it's deployed, i figured i make a second attempt at
seeing if any cygwin users are aware of any potential pitfalls.


thanks,
david


--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -