delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi   search  
Mail Archives: cygwin/2009/04/09/10:18:16

X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,GAPPY_SUBJECT
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: RE: [Attention: opengl^H^H^H^H^H w32api,libGLdevel maintainer] Incorrect GL_DOT3_RGB_EXT in glext.h
Date: Thu, 9 Apr 2009 09:17:58 -0500
Message-ID: <297343D29C14AA4D822142893ABEAEF3063E8093@srv1163ex1.flightsafety.com>
In-Reply-To: <COL104-W10B989DE3F9D5FB7E92E5F93830@phx.gbl>
References: <COL104-W10B989DE3F9D5FB7E92E5F93830 AT phx DOT gbl>
From: "Thrall, Bryan" <bryan DOT thrall AT flightsafety DOT com>
To: <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id: <cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:cygwin-unsubscribe-archive-cygwin=delorie DOT com AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

Andr=E9 Bleau wrote on Thursday, April 09, 2009 8:51 AM:
> Bryan Thrall wrote:
>> The opengl 1.1.0-10 package has incorrect values for GL_DOT3_RGB_EXT and
>> GL_DOT3_RGBA_EXT:=20
>>=20
>> #define GL_DOT3_RGB_EXT                   0x86AE
>> #define GL_DOT3_RGBA_EXT                  0x86AF
>>=20
>> According to
>> http://www.opengl.org/registry/specs/EXT/texture_env_dot3.txt, they shou=
ld
>> be:=20
>>=20
>> GL_DOT3_RGB_EXT                                    0x8740
>> GL_DOT3_RGBA_EXT                                   0x8741>
>>=20
>> I thought I'd report this here, since it doesn't seem like the canonical
>> source (according to /usr/share/doc/Cygwin/opengl-1.1.0-10.README,
>> http://www.xmission.com/~nate/glut.html) of the package hasn't been
>> updated since 2001; so I guess Andre would be the person to handle this?
>=20
> Well, no, I'm not going to handle this, because glext.h is _not_ part
> of my OpenGL package. As a "Setup Package Search" reveals:
>=20
> usr/include/GL/glext.h is part of libGL-devel-7.2-2
> usr/include/w32api/GL/glext.h is part of w32api/w32api-3.13-1,
> w32api/w32api-3.12-1, w32api/w32api-3.11-1=20
>=20
> So, it will be up to the maintainers of w32api and/or libGL-devel.
>=20
> I understand your confusion.

That's my bad; I was thinking, "I use -I/usr/include/opengl, so it must be =
the opengl package," but the fact that /usr/include/opengl/GL is a symlink =
slipped my mind. Somehow I seem to always embarrass myself with little thin=
gs like this. I blame lack of sleep :)

Thanks for the clarification.
--=20
Bryan Thrall
FlightSafety International
bryan DOT thrall AT flightsafety DOT com

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -


  webmaster     delorie software   privacy  
  Copyright © 2019   by DJ Delorie     Updated Jul 2019