X-Recipient:	archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
X-SWARE-Spam-Status:	No, hits=-0.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,J_CHICKENPOX_34,SARE_MSGID_LONG40,SPF_PASS
X-Spam-Check-By:	sourceware.org
MIME-Version:	1.0
In-Reply-To:	<20090331150728.GE12738@calimero.vinschen.de>
References:	<bc2e28c70903310234p1fa23e9esfe4e4ca8f293fbef AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <20090331112111 DOT GB12738 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <bc2e28c70903310441h7f354e5br99ecf91825231227 AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <20090331120843 DOT GD12738 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <20090331150728 DOT GE12738 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de>
Date:	Wed, 1 Apr 2009 11:19:28 +0530
Message-ID:	<bc2e28c70903312249t63444b70la92732bb3a05afe5@mail.gmail.com>
Subject:	Re: IPC,FORK on Windows 2008 Server
From:	Yarlagadda Suresh <ysuresh DOT forum AT gmail DOT com>
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
X-IsSubscribed:	yes
Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id:	<cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Unsubscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-unsubscribe-archive-cygwin=delorie DOT com AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

Thanks a ton for your quick response.

Could please let me know the patch version number, which includes the fix?

Cheers,
Suresh Kumar.

On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 8:37 PM, Corinna Vinschen
<corinna-cygwin AT cygwin DOT com> wrote:
> On Mar 31 14:08, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
>> On Mar 31 17:11, Yarlagadda Suresh wrote:
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> > I am using shmget()/shmat() methods for getting the shared memory.
>> >
>> > I had tried running the same program which is given in the previous
>> > mention thread, the results are same as mentioned over there.
>>
>> I just tried that testcase with Cygwin 1.7 and it appears to work most
>> of the time. =A0 Unfortunately I can still reproduce the problem once per
>> about 30 forks.
>>
>> I'll look into fixing this for Cygwin 1.7. =A0However, please note that
>> there is no *really* foolproof method to fix this due to the way fork
>> has to be implemented using Win32 calls. =A0I can only make it much more
>> unlikely than today.
>
> I applied a patch to Cygwin which allocates the shmat() shared memory
> regions top-down, same as the mmap() regions. =A0This should make the
> observed effect at fork() pretty unlikely. =A0The patch will be in the
> next Cygwin 1.7.0 test release (in a couple of days).
>
>
> Thanks for the report,
> Corinna
>
> --
> Corinna Vinschen =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0Please, send mails re=
garding Cygwin to
> Cygwin Project Co-Leader =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
> Red Hat
>
> --
> Unsubscribe info: =A0 =A0 =A0http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
> Problem reports: =A0 =A0 =A0 http://cygwin.com/problems.html
> Documentation: =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 http://cygwin.com/docs.html
> FAQ: =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 http://cygwin.com/faq/
>
>

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -