X-Recipient:	archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
X-SWARE-Spam-Status:	No, hits=-3.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS
X-Spam-Check-By:	sourceware.org
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
From:	Eric Backus <eric_backus AT agilent DOT com>
Subject:	Re: PING: Deprecation of -mno-cygwin.
Date:	Mon, 23 Mar 2009 17:50:58 +0000 (UTC)
Lines:	34
Message-ID:	<loom.20090323T174051-563@post.gmane.org>
References:	<49C6DADF DOT 90305 AT gmail DOT com> <20090323093234 DOT GK9322 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <49C78FA2 DOT 4010209 AT users DOT sourceforge DOT net> <alpine DOT LRH DOT 0 DOT 9999 DOT 0903230939480 DOT 20344 AT honker DOT vgersoft DOT com> <49C794CB DOT 3010305 AT gmail DOT com> <alpine DOT LRH DOT 0 DOT 9999 DOT 0903230956520 DOT 21860 AT honker DOT vgersoft DOT com> <49C79B0B DOT 9010200 AT sbcglobal DOT net> <20090323142702 DOT GB16626 AT ednor DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx>
Mime-Version:	1.0
User-Agent:	Loom/3.14 (http://gmane.org/)
X-IsSubscribed:	yes
Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id:	<cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

Christopher Faylor <cgf-use-the-mailinglist-please <at> cygwin.com> writes:
> On Mon, Mar 23, 2009 at 02:22:03PM +0000, Greg Chicares wrote:
> >On 2009-03-23 14:00Z, Steve Thompson wrote:
> >> On Mon, 23 Mar 2009, Dave Korn wrote:
> >> 
> >>>  It's a bit of a kludge compared to having a real honest-to-god
> >>> cross-compiler.  It's never worked entirely right in terms of keeping
> >>> cygwin
> >>> and mingw headers and libs completely separate.
> >> 
> >> That's very interesting. I've been using -mno-cygwin for several years, 
> >> having done many many thousands of compiles and links using it, and I
> >> have 
> >> never had a problem with either headers or libraries! Is there a 
> >> recommended alternative?
> >
> >The recommended alternative is the forthcoming mingw cross-compiler.
> >
> >I think Yaakov's right to recommend a clean break with the past: ...
> >which would put all the confusion to rest.
> 
> Big DITTO.  As Dave said, the option is already gone...

Moving to a better solution is great!  But isn't it customary to have some 
overlap period where the deprecated solution still works (but with ugly 
warnings) while the new solution is available?

I've used -mno-cygwin for many years, quite successfully, with no problems 
from headers or libraries.  I'm willing to upgrade all my Makefiles, but it 
would be nice to avoid a period where my Makefiles are broken and the new 
solution is not yet available.
-- 
Eric Backus



--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -