X-Recipient:	archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
X-SWARE-Spam-Status:	No, hits=-2.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_PASS
X-Spam-Check-By:	sourceware.org
Message-ID:	<49C58E11.9050600@gmail.com>
Date:	Sun, 22 Mar 2009 01:02:09 +0000
From:	Dave Korn <dave DOT korn DOT cygwin AT googlemail DOT com>
User-Agent:	Thunderbird 2.0.0.17 (Windows/20080914)
MIME-Version:	1.0
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] Updated: {libhdf5_0,libhdf5-devel,hdf5}-1.6.8-{3,4}
References:	<65980 DOT 93034 DOT qm AT web25008 DOT mail DOT ukl DOT yahoo DOT com>
In-Reply-To:	<65980.93034.qm@web25008.mail.ukl.yahoo.com>
Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id:	<cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

Marco Atzeri wrote:
> --- Sab 21/3/09, Peter Rosin ha scritto:

>>> Versions {libhdf5_0,libhdf5-devel,hdf5}-1.6.8-3 
>> for cygwin-1.7
>>> {libhdf5_0,libhdf5-devel,hdf5}-1.6.8-4  for
>> cygwin-1.5
>>
>> Is it a good idea - longterm - to have lower numbers for
>> cygwin-1.7?
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Peter
> 
> in this case is just by accident, usually I made reverse.
> In any case it is only relevant that the two versions have a
> different number to avoid confusion between packages.


  Given that the two are effectively in separate namespaces, and that 1.5 is
unlikely to receive many more updates (if ever), I imagine the scope for it to
cause trouble will be very limited.

    cheers,
      DaveK

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -