delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
X-Recipient: | archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com |
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: | No, hits=-1.2 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_20,J_CHICKENPOX_66,SPF_HELO_PASS |
X-Spam-Check-By: | sourceware.org |
Message-ID: | <49C2668B.2070000@cygwin.com> |
Date: | Thu, 19 Mar 2009 11:36:43 -0400 |
From: | "Larry Hall (Cygwin)" <reply-to-list-only-lh AT cygwin DOT com> |
Reply-To: | cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
User-Agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.8.1.19) Gecko/20090101 Remi/2.0.0.19-1.fc8.remi Lightning/0.9 Thunderbird/2.0.0.19 Mnenhy/0.7.5.0 |
MIME-Version: | 1.0 |
To: | cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
Subject: | Re: ls -lR too slow |
References: | <49C1EE41 DOT 5080808 AT princeton DOT edu> <49C1F3EA DOT 6060600 AT gmail DOT com> |
In-Reply-To: | <49C1F3EA.6060600@gmail.com> |
Mailing-List: | contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm |
List-Id: | <cygwin.cygwin.com> |
List-Subscribe: | <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com> |
List-Archive: | <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/> |
List-Post: | <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com> |
List-Help: | <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs> |
Sender: | cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com |
Mail-Followup-To: | cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
Delivered-To: | mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
Dave Korn wrote: > Vinod Gupta wrote: > >> When I do "ls -lR /cygdrive/z" it takes very long. >> There are only about 700 files on Z: totalling only 100 MB. When I >> monitor network counters on laptop, I see that a whopping 90 MB were >> downloaded for a payload (file list) of only 60 KB. Out of curiosity, I >> did the same experiment between two linux machines configured as NFS >> client+server. > > Perhaps more instructive would be to compare with typing "DIR Z:" in a DOS > prompt. How much time does that take, and how much network traffic does it > generate, by comparison? If the OP is looking for truer comparisons with Linux, I would say that using SAMBA on Linux is a better test than NFS. Of course, Cygwin is expected to be slower than Linux regardless. In terms of overall time/traffic with Cygwin, I'd recommend comparing the results of "DIR Z:" that Dave recommends above to "ls /cygdrive/z" (or "DIR /S Z:" to "ls -R /cygdrive/z"). If you need to use "-l" with "ls" and remote SAMBA shares, I'd recommend adding "smbntsec" to your "CYGWIN" environment variable. This should limit file accesses that "-l" (and other flags) can require. See the link below for more info: <http://cygwin.com/cygwin-ug-net/using-cygwinenv.html> -- Larry Hall http://www.rfk.com RFK Partners, Inc. (508) 893-9779 - RFK Office 216 Dalton Rd. (508) 893-9889 - FAX Holliston, MA 01746 _____________________________________________________________________ A: Yes. > Q: Are you sure? >> A: Because it reverses the logical flow of conversation. >>> Q: Why is top posting annoying in email? -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |