X-Recipient:	archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
X-Spam-Check-By:	sourceware.org
Date:	Thu, 19 Mar 2009 11:31:36 +0100
From:	Corinna Vinschen <corinna-cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: under cygwin, zsh cannot run when built against ncurses9-5.7-13
Message-ID:	<20090319103136.GB26397@calimero.vinschen.de>
Reply-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
References:	<gpf7kk$2g6$1 AT ger DOT gmane DOT org> <gpfcdo$a30$1 AT ger DOT gmane DOT org> <gpgeu9$iuo$1 AT ger DOT gmane DOT org> <Pine DOT LNX DOT 4 DOT 64 DOT 0903142203230 DOT 9859 AT gremlin DOT fruitbat DOT org> <49BF1770 DOT 9020007 AT gmail DOT com> <49C00B83 DOT 8050302 AT gmail DOT com> <20090317222721 DOT GB1505 AT ednor DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx> <49C07781 DOT 1090702 AT gmail DOT com> <20090318053237 DOT GA31643 AT ednor DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx> <49C09F09 DOT 3040804 AT gmail DOT com>
MIME-Version:	1.0
In-Reply-To:	<49C09F09.3040804@gmail.com>
User-Agent:	Mutt/1.5.19 (2009-02-20)
Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id:	<cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Unsubscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-unsubscribe-archive-cygwin=delorie DOT com AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

On Mar 18 07:13, Dave Korn wrote:
>   Ah, gottit.  The bug happens because the libraries are not quite correctly
> constructed.  When you add -lm to the link line, you see this in the map file,
> in the imports section:
> 
> /usr/lib/gcc/i686-pc-cygwin/4.3.2/libgcc_s.dll.a(d000104.o)
> 
> /usr/lib/gcc/i686-pc-cygwin/4.3.2/libgcc_s.dll.a(d000000.o) (cyggcc_s_1_dll_iname)
> /usr/lib/libm.a(d001286.o)    math.o (pow)
> /usr/lib/libm.a(d000000.o)    /usr/lib/libm.a(d001286.o) (_head_libm)
> /usr/lib/libcygwin.a(dll_entry.o)
>                               (_cygwin_dll_entry AT 12)
> 
>   There's no import name chunk for libm (_libm_dll_iname), instead the head
> chunk of the import table in libm.a refers to _cygwin1_dll_iname:
> 
> DKAdmin AT ubik /usr/src/zsh2/zsh-4.3.9/.build/Src/libm
> $ nm ./d000000.o
> 00000000 i .idata$2
> 00000000 i .idata$4
> 00000000 i .idata$5
> 00000000 I __head_libm
>          U _cygwin1_dll_iname
> 
> which means at link time it is resolved by the definition of that symbol
> supplied by libcygwin.a and so the tail chunk from libm is not pulled in to
> correctly 'cap off' the end of the import table.  Then all the name entries
> and IAT table pointers get out of sync and we get confused and overlapping
> import name tables.  Constructing import tables is tricky, and we can't
> optimise away or share any of the .idata$x blocks.
> 
>   There are a number of ways to solve this, either by changing the undefined
> symbol in the head and tail archive members, or maybe by using dlltool or ld
> to generate a fresh import library rather than munging an existing one, but
> I'm going AFK now to get a few hours sleep.

What I'm wondering is, why did it work all these years before?  Is it
a bug in the new binutils?  Or was it a bug in the old binutils to
create working results?


Corinna

-- 
Corinna Vinschen                  Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to
Cygwin Project Co-Leader          cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Red Hat

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -