X-Recipient:	archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
X-SWARE-Spam-Status:	No, hits=-2.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_PASS
X-Spam-Check-By:	sourceware.org
Message-ID:	<49C1F434.7050107@gmail.com>
Date:	Thu, 19 Mar 2009 07:28:52 +0000
From:	Dave Korn <dave DOT korn DOT cygwin AT googlemail DOT com>
User-Agent:	Thunderbird 2.0.0.17 (Windows/20080914)
MIME-Version:	1.0
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: gcc4: cc
References:	<49C0467A DOT 1080404 AT users DOT sourceforge DOT net> <49C07906 DOT 2060504 AT gmail DOT com> <49C1CA1E DOT 20509 AT users DOT sourceforge DOT net> <49C1CFE7 DOT 1030401 AT sbcglobal DOT net> <49C1E05A DOT 2060206 AT gmail DOT com> <49C1E756 DOT 7000007 AT users DOT sourceforge DOT net>
In-Reply-To:	<49C1E756.7000007@users.sourceforge.net>
Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id:	<cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

Yaakov (Cygwin/X) wrote:

> AFAIK there is no reason for a cc *script*

  Good point!

> As for c89/c99, +1 on the script idea; separate versions are definitely
> not necessary.  Are there supposed to be similar names for the ISO C++
> standards (c++98 and c++0x)?

  Would be trivial to add on top :)

    cheers,
      DaveK

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -