X-Recipient:	archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
X-SWARE-Spam-Status:	No, hits=-2.0 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,SARE_MSGID_LONG40,SPF_PASS
X-Spam-Check-By:	sourceware.org
MIME-Version:	1.0
In-Reply-To:	<49BC958D.2080306@cwilson.fastmail.fm>
References:	<49BC958D DOT 2080306 AT cwilson DOT fastmail DOT fm>
Date:	Sun, 15 Mar 2009 08:32:33 +0000
Message-ID:	<416096c60903150132g2f33c3a4od84b1122dcf4e92e@mail.gmail.com>
Subject:	Re: long unsigned int vs. uint32_t again
From:	Andy Koppe <andy DOT koppe AT gmail DOT com>
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
X-IsSubscribed:	yes
Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id:	<cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Unsubscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-unsubscribe-archive-cygwin=delorie DOT com AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

Chuck wrote:
> cygwin's <inttypes.h> has:
> #define PRIu32 "lu"
>
> and <stdint.h> has
> typedef unsigned int uint32_t;
>
> Is it possible that our inttypes.h should be changed, to use "u" for 8, 1=
6, and 32 bits?

Yep, I'd say so.

>=A0Or is gcc's -Wformat=3D2 in 3.4.4 just too strict here -- and should be=
 checking
> the actual bitwidths of types against the formats, before assuming that
> "lu" doesn't match uint32_t?

No. "long" and "int" are different types, and ignoring this would just
store up trouble for when code is ported to platforms with 64-bit
longs.

Andy

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -