X-Recipient:	archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
X-SWARE-Spam-Status:	No, hits=-2.1 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00
X-Spam-Check-By:	sourceware.org
Message-ID:	<49B092E5.40107@sbcglobal.net>
Date:	Fri, 06 Mar 2009 03:05:09 +0000
From:	Greg Chicares <gchicares AT sbcglobal DOT net>
User-Agent:	Thunderbird 2.0.0.19 (Windows/20081209)
MIME-Version:	1.0
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: [boost and xerces] ping maintainers
References:	<20090304163528 DOT PT5UE DOT 260216 DOT root AT cdptpa-web14-z02> <49AF8CB2 DOT 9040508 AT sh DOT cvut DOT cz> <49B08AC2 DOT 60509 AT smallwaters DOT com>
In-Reply-To:	<49B08AC2.60509@smallwaters.com>
X-IsSubscribed:	yes
Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id:	<cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

On 2009-03-06 02:30Z, Werner Wothke wrote:
> 
> I am using Boost's random number generator template library with cygwin 
> for statistical simulations
> and am very happy with it. It would be a shame to abandon support of the 
> Boost libraries.

That's one of the many boost libraries that has a header-only
implementation. See:

http://www.boost.org/doc/libs/1_38_0/more/getting_started/windows.html#header-only-libraries
http://www.boost.org/doc/libs?view=filtered_header-only

> Can you point out to me where you see any Boost DLLs? I only see *.hpp 
> template files.

The boost filesystem library is an example; my installation has,
in /lib/ :

$ls libboost_file*
libboost_filesystem-gcc-mt-1_33_1.a
libboost_filesystem-gcc-mt-s-1_33_1.a
libboost_filesystem-gcc-mt-s.a
libboost_filesystem-gcc-mt.a

which IIRC were all gotten via 'setup.exe'.

I gather from a glance at the boost links above that these might be
buildable as dlls instead of as static libraries, but I think what's
relevant to your question is that this library has '.cpp' files that
must be compiled separately. I believe Václav was referring to boost's
sui generis build system, which I always found a bit odd; if you want
to avoid it, this might be worth a look:
  http://boost-extras.sourceforge.net/gnu-boost/gnu-boost.html
| Tired of trying to compile boost with some weird tool only a very
| few understand? Try GNU boost!

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -