X-Recipient:	archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
X-SWARE-Spam-Status:	No, hits=-2.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS
X-Spam-Check-By:	sourceware.org
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
From:	"Akakima" <akakima33 AT gmail DOT com>
Subject:	Re: side effects after installing gcc-3.4.4.999
Date:	Mon, 2 Mar 2009 08:52:06 -0500
Lines:	18
Message-ID:	<gogodu$j1i$1@ger.gmane.org>
References:	<gofr4i$s1t$1 AT ger DOT gmane DOT org> <49AB7AE0 DOT 9040600 AT sbcglobal DOT net>
Reply-To:	"Akakima" <akakima33 AT gmail DOT com>
Mime-Version:	1.0
X-IsSubscribed:	yes
Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id:	<cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

"Greg Chicares" <gchicares AT sbcglobal DOT net> 
> If gcc version 3.x is what you want, why not just downgrade
> from 3.4.4-999 to gcc-3.4.4-3? AIUI, the only difference
> between the two is something you don't want:
> 

That's what i did (downgraded).
Still, i wanted to make someone aware of the fact that the update was
the cause of a change in behaviour.

> Alternatively, you might prefer to use mingw.org's native gcc.

I use both cygwin and mingw.
cygwin have more programs and a better "unix" support.
mingw has no dependance on a dedicated dll.




--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -