X-Recipient:	archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
X-Spam-Check-By:	sourceware.org
Date:	Mon, 2 Mar 2009 13:07:56 +0100
From:	Corinna Vinschen <corinna-cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: [1.7] rebaseall doesn't solve the problem
Message-ID:	<20090302120756.GA31166@calimero.vinschen.de>
Reply-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
References:	<499F6682 DOT 1090204 AT cwilson DOT fastmail DOT fm> <20090224100616 DOT GC6035 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <49A85971 DOT 6070300 AT cwilson DOT fastmail DOT fm> <20090228104337 DOT GG19887 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <49A986B4 DOT 2080501 AT cwilson DOT fastmail DOT fm> <20090228195127 DOT GA26646 AT ednor DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx> <20090228202850 DOT GB8503 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de>
MIME-Version:	1.0
In-Reply-To:	<20090228202850.GB8503@calimero.vinschen.de>
User-Agent:	Mutt/1.5.19 (2009-02-20)
Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id:	<cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Unsubscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-unsubscribe-archive-cygwin=delorie DOT com AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

On Feb 28 21:28, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> On Feb 28 14:51, Christopher Faylor wrote:
> > On Sat, Feb 28, 2009 at 01:47:16PM -0500, Charles Wilson wrote:
> > >Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> > >> If so, I'm wondering if setting the TS-aware flag shouldn't become
> > >> default in GCC.  What do you say, Dave?  Would that be possible?
> > >
> > >I'd probably wait on that for the /next/ release (e.g. after 4.3.2-2),
> > >[...]
> > >Maybe the aslr functionality is different enough -- and useful in enough
> > >contexts that differ from rebasing -- that instead of incorporating
> > >'call aslr TOO' into rebaseall, there should be a separate 'aslrall' script?
> > 
> > It should be trivial to add this to binutils.  Doesn't it ultimately
> > belong in ld and (maybe) objcopy?
> 
> Yes, that should be done in ld.
> 
> > I can add this now but I don't think it should be the default just yet.
> 
> If the TS-aware flag actually helps to avoid the tsappcmp.dll bug, then
> I think the flag should be set by ld by default for Cygwin apps.

Btw., I just noticed that the Visual C++ Linker sets the TS-aware flag
by default, see http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/01cfys9z.aspx

It would probably be very helpful in the long run if ld had some generic
option to set any of the Windows-specific header flags at build time.


Corinna

-- 
Corinna Vinschen                  Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to
Cygwin Project Co-Leader          cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Red Hat

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -