delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
X-Recipient: | archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com |
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: | No, hits=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SARE_MSGID_LONG40,SPF_PASS |
X-Spam-Check-By: | sourceware.org |
MIME-Version: | 1.0 |
In-Reply-To: | <49A986B4.2080501@cwilson.fastmail.fm> |
References: | <499F6682 DOT 1090204 AT cwilson DOT fastmail DOT fm> <20090224100616 DOT GC6035 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <49A85971 DOT 6070300 AT cwilson DOT fastmail DOT fm> <20090228104337 DOT GG19887 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <49A986B4 DOT 2080501 AT cwilson DOT fastmail DOT fm> |
Date: | Sat, 28 Feb 2009 14:34:01 -0500 |
Message-ID: | <17393e3e0902281134w490c75d8p926dcbca94dfb0d1@mail.gmail.com> |
Subject: | Re: [1.7] rebaseall doesn't solve the problem |
From: | Matt Wozniski <godlygeek AT gmail DOT com> |
To: | cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
X-IsSubscribed: | yes |
Mailing-List: | contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm |
List-Id: | <cygwin.cygwin.com> |
List-Unsubscribe: | <mailto:cygwin-unsubscribe-archive-cygwin=delorie DOT com AT cygwin DOT com> |
List-Subscribe: | <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com> |
List-Archive: | <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/> |
List-Post: | <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com> |
List-Help: | <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs> |
Sender: | cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com |
Mail-Followup-To: | cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
Delivered-To: | mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
On 2/28/09, Charles Wilson wrote: > Maybe the aslr functionality is different enough -- and useful in enough > contexts that differ from rebasing -- that instead of incorporating > 'call aslr TOO' into rebaseall, there should be a separate 'aslrall' script? +1 for that suggestion. It's doing something completely different. It will only work on systems with ASLR, which IIUC excludes XP SP1 and 2000. Even where it will work, rebasing might still be required if there are too many DLLs for _MiImageBitMap to track them all. Where it does work completely, the rebasing part of rebaseall should be unneeded, right? All of that seems to speak to a desire to have it available as a separate script, though maybe having a flag for rebaseall to call that script would be useful. Hope I didn't misunderstand any of this discussion... :-) ~Matt -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |