delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
Dave Korn wrote: > http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2008-07/msg00372.html > > So I believe now this is a symptom of a buggy ld already fixed upstream. > I'll try the testcase again against one of my CVS builds of binutils and > report back, but I expect it will fix the problem and rebase will no longer > alter the unlinked weak null-initialised pointer. Confirmed. (This has implications which I will pursue in the GCC4 thread on -apps.) cheers, DaveK -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |