X-Recipient:	archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
X-SWARE-Spam-Status:	No, hits=-2.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_PASS
X-Spam-Check-By:	sourceware.org
Message-ID:	<49A5ACDF.4020001@gmail.com>
Date:	Wed, 25 Feb 2009 20:41:03 +0000
From:	Dave Korn <dave DOT korn DOT cygwin AT googlemail DOT com>
User-Agent:	Thunderbird 2.0.0.17 (Windows/20080914)
MIME-Version:	1.0
To:	Dave Korn <dave DOT korn DOT cygwin AT googlemail DOT com>
CC:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] [1.7] Updated: file-5.00-1
References:	<announce DOT 20090210093102 DOT GB11175 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <499E2B9A DOT 5030907 AT cwilson DOT fastmail DOT fm> <20090220095916 DOT GA759 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <499EB5A6 DOT 5000707 AT gmail DOT com> <499EBABE DOT 8080303 AT gmail DOT com> <499EC6E5 DOT 5000408 AT gmail DOT com>
In-Reply-To:	<499EC6E5.5000408@gmail.com>
Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id:	<cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

Dave Korn wrote:

>   The purpose of playing these games is in order not to drag in the whole
> exception handling machinery into a statically-linked application unless we
> actually need it.  We're relying on detecting an unlinked weak symbol by it
> having a value of zero at runtime.  That usually works, but the pointer
> variable register_frame_info_ptr must have some kind of reloc pointing at it,
> because rebase adjusts it, so instead of zero it becomes equal to the
> difference between the new and old base addresses.


  That rang a bell, and reminded me of something Danny posted a little while back:

http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2008-07/msg00372.html

  So I believe now this is a symptom of a buggy ld already fixed upstream.
I'll try the testcase again against one of my CVS builds of binutils and
report back, but I expect it will fix the problem and rebase will no longer
alter the unlinked weak null-initialised pointer.

    cheers,
      DaveK


--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -