X-Recipient:	archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
X-SWARE-Spam-Status:	No, hits=-2.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_PASS
X-Spam-Check-By:	sourceware.org
Message-ID:	<49A22417.2040501@bmts.com>
Date:	Sun, 22 Feb 2009 23:20:39 -0500
From:	Ralph Hempel <rhempel AT bmts DOT com>
User-Agent:	Thunderbird 2.0.0.6 (X11/20071022)
MIME-Version:	1.0
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: Setup - command line only
References:	<49A1DF61 DOT 5000509 AT gmail DOT com> <49A20419 DOT 4050603 AT cygwin DOT com> <49A21B54 DOT 1030305 AT bmts DOT com> <49A2207E DOT 6030804 AT cygwin DOT com>
In-Reply-To:	<49A2207E.6030804@cygwin.com>
X-brucetelecom.com-MailScanner-Information:	Please contact Bruce Telecom 519.368.2000 for more information
X-brucetelecom.com-MailScanner:	Found to be clean
X-brucetelecom.com-MailScanner-From:	rhempel AT bmts DOT com
X-IsSubscribed:	yes
Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id:	<cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

Larry Hall (Cygwin) wrote:
> Ralph Hempel wrote:
>> Larry Hall (Cygwin) wrote:
>>
>>> No, it's only the 289th time, which probably accounts for why you 
>>> couldn't
>>> find it with Google. ;-)  These kinds of features are missing from
>>> 'setup.exe' because there hasn't been a volunteer contributor for them.
>>> If you're interested in contributing something, see the link below:
>>
>> OK, the update of setup is not supported, but setup DOES in fact
>> allow fully command line based operation. I know because I moaned
>> about it, collected and tested patches, and even contributed a minor
>> fix to the option parsing.
> 
> That's true but I believe the OP was lamenting that there wasn't a
> version that didn't still have the GUI even when run from the command
> line.  If I'm wrong, then I'm sure you've made the OP's day. :-)

That's what I like about this list - there's always another way to
interpret a question.

For me, the fact that I can now drive setup using a command line is
good enough. The fact that the GUI is still visible and being driven
by the magic command line incantation is a non-issue for me :-)

Ralph

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -