X-Recipient:	archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
X-SWARE-Spam-Status:	No, hits=-2.1 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SARE_SUB_ENC_UTF8
X-Spam-Check-By:	sourceware.org
MIME-Version:	1.0
Date:	Fri, 20 Feb 2009 15:17:33 +0100
From:	"Vincent R." <forumer AT smartmobili DOT com>
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: Windows =?UTF-8?Q?Mobile=3F?=
In-Reply-To:	<499EB6DD.1080305@gmail.com>
References:	<2638D07BD46A48F6A2EFD3165EA6130B AT luggage> <a1643f9bfacebd711fd8699980b3bb63 AT mail DOT smartmobili DOT com> <499EB6DD DOT 1080305 AT gmail DOT com>
Message-ID:	<0ef59f26ed0ef91d93beae42b7871fa3@mail.smartmobili.com>
X-Sender:	forumer AT smartmobili DOT com
User-Agent:	RoundCube Webmail/0.2
X-IsSubscribed:	yes
Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id:	<cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Unsubscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-unsubscribe-archive-cygwin=delorie DOT com AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

On Fri, 20 Feb 2009 13:57:49 +0000, Dave Korn
<dave DOT korn DOT cygwin AT googlemail DOT com> wrote:
> Vincent R. wrote:
>> On Fri, 20 Feb 2009 11:20:41 -0000, "Harold Fuchs" wrote:
>>> Are there any plans to port Cygwin to Windows Mobile? Dates?
> 
>   Not that I know of.
> 
>>> If not, I'd be interested to know why.
> 
>   Well, the reason I wasn't planning to do it is because I don't ever use
> Windows Mobile.  I can't speak for anyone else of course.
> 
>> You can already use cegcc, don't see the point to port cygwin.
> 
>   Huh?  You can already use MinGW on ordinary windows, but there was a
>   point
> in writing Cygwin in the first place.  Neither cegcc nor MinGW give you a
> Posix API and environment; that's what Cygwin does on non-mobile Windows,
> and
> that's what would be the point of porting it to Mobile Windows.  Am I
> missing
> something here?
> 

Still don't understand because cegcc provides you with POSIX API!
And what would mean to port cygwin on Windows Mobile, does it mean you want
a terminal with a compiler running directly on the device ?

You need to know that cegcc is actually a common name for two different
toolchains

cegcc = POSIX API + newlib libc
mingw32ce = mingw for wince : native API + native libc

To say it differently :
cegcc = cygwin for wince
mingw32ce = mingw for wince

But maybe I am the one missing something ?


--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -