X-Recipient:	archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
X-Spam-Check-By:	sourceware.org
Date:	Thu, 19 Feb 2009 09:27:34 -0500
From:	Christopher Faylor <cgf-use-the-mailinglist-please AT cygwin DOT com>
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: [1.7] "broken" pipe implementation?
Message-ID:	<20090219142734.GA22666@ednor.casa.cgf.cx>
Reply-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
References:	<tcqqp4pir13cnq0oa8psu1uq4lso1q2550 AT 4ax DOT com>
MIME-Version:	1.0
In-Reply-To:	<tcqqp4pir13cnq0oa8psu1uq4lso1q2550@4ax.com>
User-Agent:	Mutt/1.5.16 (2007-06-09)
Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id:	<cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Unsubscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-unsubscribe-archive-cygwin=delorie DOT com AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 09:16:50AM -0500, Andrew Schulman wrote:
>I'm compiling screen for 1.7.  The configure script has a test for a "usable"
>pipe implementation, which passes, and another one for a "working" pipe
>implementation, which fails.  The test for a working pipe implementation is zero
>exit code from the following program (simplified for clarity):

I'll look into this sometime today.

cgf

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -