X-Recipient:	archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
X-SWARE-Spam-Status:	No, hits=-1.7 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_PASS
X-Spam-Check-By:	sourceware.org
Message-ID:	<496A646C.7080504@gmail.com>
Date:	Sun, 11 Jan 2009 21:28:12 +0000
From:	Andy Koppe <andy DOT koppe AT gmail DOT com>
User-Agent:	Thunderbird 2.0.0.18 (Windows/20081105)
MIME-Version:	1.0
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: MinTTY "vs" rxvt (was Re: MinTTY 0.3.3)
References:	<20090111040508 DOT GA8342 AT ednor DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx> <496A54F6 DOT 7020107 AT cwilson DOT fastmail DOT fm>
In-Reply-To:	<496A54F6.7020107@cwilson.fastmail.fm>
X-IsSubscribed:	yes
Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id:	<cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

Charles Wilson wrote:
> Christopher Faylor wrote:
>> If so, should we consider deprecating rxvt in
>> favor of MinTTY when MinTTY becomes a real package?
>>
>> If not, there is no harm in keeping two packages in the distribution.  I
>> was just trying to lighten your load if you were interested.
> 
> I'd lean toward keeping both in the distro

Same here.

> (mainly because I'd hate to
> see a never-ending flood of "where'd rxvt go?" queries. That'd be more
> of a pain than the relatively infrequent updates that rxvt gets).

And I'd be dreading the inevitable demands to implement every single 
feature and option that rxvt provides.

> You mean like another setup.exe pane (or option in an existing pane) to
> select the terminal that should be started by the "default" Cygwin link
> in the Start Menu?  That's an interesting idea...

How about just providing Start Menu shortcuts for all installed 
terminals in a "Cygwin" folder, much like Yaakov has done in MinTTY's 
cygports package? The user could always copy them to more easily 
accessible places as needed, or just rely on the recently-used list.

>> Or just switch rxvt to the regular X11 version w/o all the libW11 hackery?

Bypassing the X protocol by implementing Xlib directly on Win32 does 
seem rather a good idea in principle at least. How come it hasn't been 
used more widely?

Andy

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -