X-Recipient:	archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
X-SWARE-Spam-Status:	No, hits=-2.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_PASS
X-Spam-Check-By:	sourceware.org
Message-ID:	<496992C3.4010607@users.sourceforge.net>
Date:	Sun, 11 Jan 2009 00:33:39 -0600
From:	"Yaakov (Cygwin/X)" <yselkowitz AT users DOT sourceforge DOT net>
User-Agent:	Thunderbird 2.0.0.19 (Windows/20081209)
MIME-Version:	1.0
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: pedantic/misled/confused/passive-aggressive (was Re: MinTTY 0.3.3)
References:	<20090111040508 DOT GA8342 AT ednor DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx>
In-Reply-To:	<20090111040508.GA8342@ednor.casa.cgf.cx>
Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id:	<cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256

Christopher Faylor wrote:
 > Just to contribute something useful: Chuck Wilson, if you are reading
> this, am I correct in assuming that you don't enjoy maintaining the
> Windows version of rxvt?  If so, should we consider deprecating rxvt in
> favor of MinTTY when MinTTY becomes a real package?

Or just switch rxvt to the regular X11 version w/o all the libW11 hackery?


Yaakov
Cygwin/X
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (Cygwin)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iEYEAREIAAYFAklpksMACgkQpiWmPGlmQSP9KwCfcRpbeWRn2zJXiwuWQDJkgNeL
5J4AnRvIXPpUswp6a6UNTxGMRudYIf19
=KICh
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -