X-Recipient:	archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
X-SWARE-Spam-Status:	No, hits=-2.0 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,SARE_MSGID_LONG40,SPF_PASS
X-Spam-Check-By:	sourceware.org
Message-ID:	<bc4dea070901102027y7550325dlc513ccbcff47cbe7@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Sat, 10 Jan 2009 20:27:26 -0800
From:	"John Russell" <johnwrussell AT gmail DOT com>
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	scsh-0.6.7-2: (date) fails to use local time zone after the first call
MIME-Version:	1.0
Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id:	<cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

According the the scsh manual, (date) is supposed to return the
current date in the local time zone.   However, in the Cygwin
scsh-0.6.7-2 package, it only works that way the first time that
(date) is called.  After that, it returns dates in the UTC timezone.

Test script:

#!/usr/bin/scsh -s
!#
(define (show-date d)
  (display (date:tz-name d))
  (display " ")
  (display (date:tz-secs d))
  (newline))

(show-date (date))
(show-date (date))

Using the Cygwin scsh-0.6.7-2 package, I get this incorrect output --
the two lines should be the same:

PST+8 -28800
UCT 0

I uninstalled the Cygwin scsh package, and rebuilt scsh from source,
using the scsh-0.6.7.tar.gz tarball.  I got the same incorrect
results.

I remade scsh in a Fedora environment from the same tarball, and I got
correct results:

PST+8 -28800
PST+8 -28800

So far, I haven't figured out why I get different results on Cygwin.
I did observe that, on Cygwin, different #ifdef compilation conditions
are used in compiling time1.c.   When compiling on Cygwin, HAVE_TZNAME
is true and HAVE_STRUCT_TM_TM_ZONE is false.  When compiling on
Fedora, the opposite is the case.  I don't know if that is relevant to
my problem, but I thought I'd mention it for what it's worth.

Any suggestions will be much appreciated!

Cheers,

John

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -