Mail Archives: cygwin/2009/01/07/19:31:54
Grant Edwards wrote:
> On 2009-01-07, Larry Hall (Cygwin) <reply-to-list-only-lh AT cygwin DOT
com> wrote:
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
<http://cygwin.com/acronyms/#PCYMTNQREAIYR> Thanks.
>> Grant Edwards wrote:
>>> I need to put a Cygwin snapshot on CD[*].
>>>
>>> To that end I've been searching the mailing list archive. So
>>> far the scripts wirtten by Vin Shelton look like they're
>>> awfully close to what I want.
>>>
>>> http://www.Cygwin.com/ml/Cygwin/2007-03/msg00606.html
>> This link goes nowhere for me.
>
> Doh! My spell-checker capitalized Cygwin. It should be
>
> http://www.cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2007-03/msg00606.html
Got it. Looks OK.
>> The Cygwin DLL is meant to be backward compatible through the
>> 1.5 series. There will, of course, be a difference moving
>> from 1.5 to 1.7. After that, later 1.7 releases will be
>> compatible with earlier ones. And by compatible, I mean
>> binary compatible. No rebuild necessary. If you find this is
>> not the case with 1.7, then that would be good to report.
>> Since 1.5 is a dead end, it doesn't make allot of sense to
>> report these kinds of problems for it. Of course, as you
>> note, other packages aren't necessarily compatible through all
>> their versions or even their minor version bumps. If you need
>> to support a particular set of Cygwin tools, it can make sense
>> to lock the set you're working with. Of course, you'll still
>> need to contend with users that already may have Cygwin
>> installed and the version conflicts there.
>
> Users who already have Cygwin installed are probably savvy
> enough to build the tools from sources. If that doesn't work
> then they're out of luck, and should just do things right and
> install Linux.
>
>> And, as you noted, you need to distribute the source of your
>> application
>
> I don't see what my application has to do with anything. Just
> because I compile an application with gcc, that doesn't place
> the application under the GPL.
OK, I missed that part then.
--
Larry Hall http://www.rfk.com
RFK Partners, Inc. (508) 893-9779 - RFK Office
216 Dalton Rd. (508) 893-9889 - FAX
Holliston, MA 01746
_____________________________________________________________________
A: Yes.
> Q: Are you sure?
>> A: Because it reverses the logical flow of conversation.
>>> Q: Why is top posting annoying in email?
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
- Raw text -