delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
X-Recipient: | archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com |
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: | No, hits=-2.1 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 |
X-Spam-Check-By: | sourceware.org |
Message-Id: | <5.2.0.9.1.20090107170800.01ebc130@localhost> |
X-Sender: | cenedese AT localhost |
Date: | Wed, 07 Jan 2009 17:18:33 +0100 |
To: | cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
From: | Fabian Cenedese <Cenedese AT indel DOT ch> |
Subject: | Empty include file on samba share |
Mime-Version: | 1.0 |
X-IsSubscribed: | yes |
Mailing-List: | contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm |
List-Id: | <cygwin.cygwin.com> |
List-Subscribe: | <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com> |
List-Archive: | <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/> |
List-Post: | <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com> |
List-Help: | <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs> |
Sender: | cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com |
Mail-Followup-To: | cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
Delivered-To: | mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
Hi I have a problem that may be cygwin or not. I'll just ask here if anybody knows something (or to show me some better place to go to). We use a quite old cross-gcc (2.95.2), built with cygwin and running on various windows (since NT on to vista). The currently used cygwin is version 1.5.19-cr-0x5ef, but we have also worked with other versions. We have some projects that are C++ with header files and can be compiled with no problems on a local drive. However if the whole C++ project is moved from the local drive to a share (samba, probably also windows) the compilation may fail with various errors. The main problem seems to be that include files are not read properly. They are found (gcc emits an error if the name is wrong) but the content seems not to be read. Even if such a problematic header file contains crap it is not mentioned by gcc. To make things worse is that on different computers the compilation may fail differently or even work without problems. I don't know if there's anything I could change in cygwin to improve this (except updating, but I'd like to hear first, if this is known). Has anybody ever experienced something similar? Or an idea what I could look into (from the cygwin side)? I have already asked on the gcc mailinglist, but it was unknown so far. Thanks for any help bye Fabi -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |