X-Recipient:	archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
X-SWARE-Spam-Status:	No, hits=-1.2 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_HELO_PASS,TVD_SPACED_SUBJECT_WORD3
X-Spam-Check-By:	sourceware.org
Message-ID:	<495AFA99.3080705@cygwin.com>
Date:	Tue, 30 Dec 2008 23:52:41 -0500
From:	"Larry Hall (Cygwin)" <reply-to-list-only-lh AT cygwin DOT com>
Reply-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
User-Agent:	Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.8.1.18) Gecko/20081120 Remi/2.0.0.18-1.fc8.remi Lightning/0.9 Thunderbird/2.0.0.18 Mnenhy/0.7.5.0
MIME-Version:	1.0
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: MinTTY
References:	<495917BA DOT 1090401 AT gmail DOT com> <B156E7DDCF464660AEABAB84A01F365A AT DFW5RB41> <0E77A4429F494644A9C7CB6F6F3D2125 AT DFW5RB41> <0105D5C1E0353146B1B222348B0411A211B41DD8 AT NIHMLBX02 DOT nih DOT gov> <20081230165106 DOT GA5230 AT ednor DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx> <495AF5CC DOT 7040903 AT etr-usa DOT com>
In-Reply-To:	<495AF5CC.7040903@etr-usa.com>
Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id:	<cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

Warren Young wrote:
> Christopher Faylor wrote:
>>
>> I don't really feel comfortable having
>> another ssh implementation in Cygwin.
> 
> wget, curl
> lftp, ncftp
> links, lynx
> GraphicsMagic, ImageMagick
> ash, bash, tcsh, zsh, scsh, pdksh, posh
> vim, nano, emacs, joe, xemacs, nedit, xedit, gvim
> 
> ....need I go on?
> 
> Not that I'm pushing for including a puttycyg package.  You'll just need 
> a better justification than that to keep it out.

What do any of the programs you've listed have to do with ssh?  Certainly
none of these that comprise Cygwin packages have a ssh implementation of
their own as part of the package.  Since this is what Chris was voicing
concern about, I don't see that any of utilities you listed above would
fall into the same category.  I guess you'll have to try harder. ;-)

-- 
Larry Hall                              http://www.rfk.com
RFK Partners, Inc.                      (508) 893-9779 - RFK Office
216 Dalton Rd.                          (508) 893-9889 - FAX
Holliston, MA 01746

_____________________________________________________________________

A: Yes.
 > Q: Are you sure?
 >> A: Because it reverses the logical flow of conversation.
 >>> Q: Why is top posting annoying in email?

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -