X-Recipient:	archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
X-SWARE-Spam-Status:	No, hits=-2.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00
X-Spam-Check-By:	sourceware.org
Message-ID:	<4959125A.6020708@x-ray.at>
Date:	Mon, 29 Dec 2008 19:09:30 +0100
From:	Reini Urban <rurban AT x-ray DOT at>
User-Agent:	Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; de-AT; rv:1.8.1.19) Gecko/20081204 SeaMonkey/1.1.14
MIME-Version:	1.0
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: Cygwin struct alignment
References:	<006b01c965c1$6a7c6300$4001a8c0 AT mycomputer> <003a01c965fe$539063c0$4001a8c0 AT mycomputer> <495291CD DOT 1000207 AT bmts DOT com> <004701c96993$ea2fa5f0$4001a8c0 AT mycomputer>
In-Reply-To:	<004701c96993$ea2fa5f0$4001a8c0@mycomputer>
X-IsSubscribed:	yes
Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id:	<cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Note-from-DJ:	This may be spam

John Emmas schrieb:
> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Ralph Hempel"
> Sent: 24 December 2008 19:47
> Subject: Re: Cygwin struct alignment
>>
>> John, if I understand you correctly, you are running up against
>> a classic problem in embedded systems programming. Namely that
>> you cannot assume anything about structure packing, byte ordering,
>> or alignment when doing RPC or transmitting data across platforms.
>>
> Yesterday I spent some time looking into this but didn't come to any
> hard & fast conclusions.   Variables themselves seem to correlate very well
> between MSVC and Cygwin (even 'long' which I thought was different).  But
> when calculating structure alignment (manually) sometimes Cygwin gave
> closer results to what I expected and sometime MSVC was closer.
> 
> Before I try Ralph's suggestion I'd like (if possible) to try building both
> versions with struct packing disabled.  This is fairly simple to do with
> Microsoft's compiler (I just set the member alignment to '1 byte') but can
> it be done for my Cygwin compiler - e.g. with a compiler option or a 
> #pragma
> or whatever?

Which "Cygwin compiler"?
I have about a dozen compilers in my cygwin environment.
If you mean gcc-core-3.4.4-3 or gcc-mingw-core-3.4.4-20050522-1 please 
say so.
Cygwin per se infers no struct alignment at all, nor exists one "Cygwin 
compiler" only.

For the record:
There's also gcc4-core-4.3.2-1, for the C side, and of course various 
other compilers, such as clisp, parrot, chicken, gcc-g++, gcc4-g++, 
gcc-gpc, gcc-java, gcc-g77, gcc-ada, jikes, SWI-Prolog, cocom, ocaml,
and from other sites bigloo, ikarus, plt.
And there are various other cross-gcc packages around.
Most with different "struct" or "record" packing and alignments.

I haven't got llvm, ghc, and Modula-3 working yet.
-- 
Reini Urban
http://phpwiki.org/  http://murbreak.at/

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -