delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
X-Recipient: | archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com |
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: | No, hits=-1.2 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_20 |
X-Spam-Check-By: | sourceware.org |
Date: | Mon, 29 Dec 2008 10:34:54 -0600 |
From: | Brian Ford <Brian DOT Ford AT FlightSafety DOT com> |
Reply-To: | cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
To: | cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
Subject: | Re: Cygwin struct alignment |
In-Reply-To: | <004701c96993$ea2fa5f0$4001a8c0@mycomputer> |
Message-ID: | <Pine.CYG.4.58.0812291032260.2944@PC1163-8460-XP.flightsafety.com> |
References: | <006b01c965c1$6a7c6300$4001a8c0 AT mycomputer> <003a01c965fe$539063c0$4001a8c0 AT mycomputer> <495291CD DOT 1000207 AT bmts DOT com> <004701c96993$ea2fa5f0$4001a8c0 AT mycomputer> |
MIME-Version: | 1.0 |
X-IsSubscribed: | yes |
Mailing-List: | contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm |
List-Id: | <cygwin.cygwin.com> |
List-Unsubscribe: | <mailto:cygwin-unsubscribe-archive-cygwin=delorie DOT com AT cygwin DOT com> |
List-Subscribe: | <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com> |
List-Archive: | <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/> |
List-Post: | <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com> |
List-Help: | <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs> |
Sender: | cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com |
Mail-Followup-To: | cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
Delivered-To: | mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
On Mon, 29 Dec 2008, John Emmas wrote: > Yesterday I spent some time looking into this but didn't come to any > hard & fast conclusions. Variables themselves seem to correlate very well > between MSVC and Cygwin (even 'long' which I thought was different). But > when calculating structure alignment (manually) sometimes Cygwin gave > closer results to what I expected and sometime MSVC was closer. The only major difference I'm aware of is that Cygwin defaults to 8 byte alignment for long long and double for performance reasons, while MSVC defaults to 4 byte alignment for those types I believe. > Before I try Ralph's suggestion I'd like (if possible) to try building both > versions with struct packing disabled. This is fairly simple to do with > Microsoft's compiler (I just set the member alignment to '1 byte') but can > it be done for my Cygwin compiler - e.g. with a compiler option or a #pragma > or whatever? Google attribute packed as I don't remember the exact syntax, but I fail to see how this actually helps your cause. -- Brian Ford Staff Realtime Software Engineer VITAL - Visual Simulation Systems FlightSafety International the best safety device in any aircraft is a well-trained crew... -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |