delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi   search  
Mail Archives: cygwin/2008/12/22/14:46:22

X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_20,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
X-Trace: 119225075/mk-filter-4.mail.uk.tiscali.com/B2C/$b2c-THROTTLED-DYNAMIC/b2c-CUSTOMER-DYNAMIC-IP/79.66.17.75/None/johne53 AT tiscali DOT co DOT uk
X-SBRS: None
X-RemoteIP: 79.66.17.75
X-IP-MAIL-FROM: johne53 AT tiscali DOT co DOT uk
X-MUA: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.2180Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2180
X-IP-BHB: Once
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: ApwEAAt9T0lPQhFL/2dsb2JhbACEVbpzWJAehkM
Message-ID: <00a701c9646d$d9d55720$4001a8c0@mycomputer>
From: "John Emmas" <johne53 AT tiscali DOT co DOT uk>
To: <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
References: <005b01c96455$6c6bed60$4001a8c0 AT mycomputer> <2ca21dcc0812220903k38b8923v892f508b2ec55620 AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <20081222172855 DOT GB27364 AT ednor DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx> <002001c96462$6a46d790$4001a8c0 AT mycomputer> <20081222184129 DOT GA23447 AT ednor DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx> <007d01c96468$2fb2e780$4001a8c0 AT mycomputer> <20081222191336 DOT GC23447 AT ednor DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx>
Subject: Re: Named pipes (blocking problem)
Date: Mon, 22 Dec 2008 19:45:32 -0000
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id: <cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Note-from-DJ: This may be spam

Thanks for that link Christopher.  It was very helpful.

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Christopher Faylor"
Subject: Re: Named pipes (blocking problem)
>
> Why are you duplicating the subject in the body of the message?
>
I know this is something that irks you and you often complain about it but
in fact, it can be very helpful to people with low resolution monitors.  In
this particular case, it won't make a vast difference because my subject
heading is only about 30 characters or so.  But if the subject heading is
lengthy, it will get truncated by the email client if the user has a low-res
monitor.

Here's an example (not wholly relevant but it'll suffice for explanation
purposes).  A message I received from cygwin-ports has the subject:-

Re: [Cygwin-ports-general] Revised patch set for X server 1.5.2

In Outlook Express, all I can see of that subject is this:-

Re: [Cygwin-ports-general] Revised patch se...

By the time people have added "Off topic" or various other things to a
subject, the subject itself can become so truncated as to be useless.
Including it in the body of the message means that people don't need to keep
adjusting their client panes to read headings that have become too long to
fit inside their client's "subject" column.

John


--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -


  webmaster     delorie software   privacy  
  Copyright © 2019   by DJ Delorie     Updated Jul 2019