delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
X-Recipient: | archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com |
X-Spam-Check-By: | sourceware.org |
Message-ID: | <49457F56.1040508@cornell.edu> |
Date: | Sun, 14 Dec 2008 16:49:10 -0500 |
From: | Ken Brown <kbrown AT cornell DOT edu> |
User-Agent: | Thunderbird 2.0.0.17 (Windows/20080914) |
MIME-Version: | 1.0 |
To: | cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
Subject: | Re: [1.7] Problem - emacs fails to get shell-command output |
References: | <announce DOT 20081210203400 DOT GA15192 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <4941587D DOT 5070109 AT cornell DOT edu> <17393e3e0812111130n3dda8d05n8465481c68b97596 AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> |
In-Reply-To: | <17393e3e0812111130n3dda8d05n8465481c68b97596@mail.gmail.com> |
X-IsSubscribed: | yes |
Mailing-List: | contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm |
List-Id: | <cygwin.cygwin.com> |
List-Subscribe: | <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com> |
List-Archive: | <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/> |
List-Post: | <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com> |
List-Help: | <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs> |
Sender: | cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com |
Mail-Followup-To: | cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
Delivered-To: | mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
On 12/11/2008 2:30 PM, Matt Wozniski wrote: > On Thu, Dec 11, 2008 at 1:14 PM, Ken Brown wrote: >> One other thing I've noticed, which I think is unrelated, is that there is a >> glitch in directory listing in emacs under cygwin 1.7: If you try to list a >> directory with control-x d, very often the directory listing makes it look >> like the directory is empty when it isn't. Typing "g" (to ask emacs to >> redisplay the directory) usually results in a correct listing. >> [...] > > With no knowledge of cygwin's internals, I'd much sooner guess the > changes to the pipe code... I should have just reported the symptom instead of trying to guess the cause: Emacs runs the shell command "ls -al" and thinks there's no output. Here's a second example. I used emacs's "ediff" function to compare two buffers, and it reported (incorrectly) that there were no differences. So it seems that emacs called on the shell to run "diff" but didn't get the output. Ken -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |