X-Recipient:	archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
X-Spam-Check-By:	sourceware.org
Date:	Tue, 9 Dec 2008 15:15:46 +0100
From:	Corinna Vinschen <corinna-cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: ssh-host-config problem on windows 2003, please help.
Message-ID:	<20081209141546.GL12905@calimero.vinschen.de>
Reply-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
References:	<582532 DOT 8302 DOT qm AT web53310 DOT mail DOT re2 DOT yahoo DOT com> <20081208151350 DOT GY12905 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <493E1E35 DOT 2020407 AT cwilson DOT fastmail DOT fm> <20081209091657 DOT GD12905 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de>
MIME-Version:	1.0
In-Reply-To:	<20081209091657.GD12905@calimero.vinschen.de>
User-Agent:	Mutt/1.5.16 (2007-06-09)
Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id:	<cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Unsubscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-unsubscribe-archive-cygwin=delorie DOT com AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

On Dec  9 10:16, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> On Dec  9 02:28, Charles Wilson wrote:
> > Okay. So, suppose we modify the pseudo-code and word the non-auto-answer
> > question like the auto-answer=yes case.  Then, somebody looking at a
> > manual transcript might ask: I want to run this script "safely" so that
> > things are set up, but no services are actually installed and no new
> > user accounts are created. Should I use --yes, or --no?  Under this
> > modified pseudocode, the answer would be --no, except I think I want
> > --yes (e.g. I want the default prived user) for "Do you want to use this
> > account name for running this service"
> > 
> > Anybody have a better idea, that works for both "automated" cases yet
> > doesn't confuse the heck out of somebody trying to figure out which of
> > --yes or --no to use when implementing their own automation?
> 
> A --user option?

Or maybe better --service-account?


Corinna

-- 
Corinna Vinschen                  Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to
Cygwin Project Co-Leader          cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Red Hat

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -