X-Recipient:	archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
X-Spam-Check-By:	sourceware.org
X-IronPort-AV:	E=Sophos;i="4.33,680,1220220000"; d="scan'208";a="17722042"
Date:	Fri, 28 Nov 2008 10:09:27 +0100
From:	Samuel Thibault <samuel DOT thibault AT ens-lyon DOT org>
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: sem_unlink?
Message-ID:	<20081128090927.GC5154@const.bordeaux.inria.fr>
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
References:	<20081127231651 DOT GB6403 AT const DOT famille DOT thibault DOT fr> <20081128021823 DOT GG16768 AT ednor DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx>
MIME-Version:	1.0
In-Reply-To:	<20081128021823.GG16768@ednor.casa.cgf.cx>
User-Agent:	Mutt/1.5.12-2006-07-14
X-IsSubscribed:	yes
Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id:	<cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Unsubscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-unsubscribe-archive-cygwin=delorie DOT com AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

Christopher Faylor, le Thu 27 Nov 2008 21:18:23 -0500, a écrit :
> On Fri, Nov 28, 2008 at 12:16:51AM +0100, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> >There is no sem_unlink function, is there a reason or is that a PTW?
> 
> PTC.  It's not easy to get right in a Windows environment.  If I read
> what's required correctly it could require interprocess communication.

Mmm, I haven't tested (and can't right now), but does that mean that
even if sem_open() is currently provided, it does not work?

Samuel

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -