X-Recipient:	archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
X-Spam-Check-By:	sourceware.org
From:	"Dave Korn" <dave DOT korn AT artimi DOT com>
To:	<cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
References:	<001801c93833$b2818510$4001a8c0 AT mycomputer> <001801c93835$1393b840$9601a8c0 AT CAM DOT ARTIMI DOT COM> <20081028144825 DOT GC15406 AT ednor DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx>
Subject:	RE: User name problem
Date:	Tue, 28 Oct 2008 15:19:08 -0000
Message-ID:	<00c301c93910$884df480$9601a8c0@CAM.ARTIMI.COM>
MIME-Version:	1.0
X-Mailer:	Microsoft Office Outlook 11
In-Reply-To:	<20081028144825.GC15406@ednor.casa.cgf.cx>
Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id:	<cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Unsubscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-unsubscribe-archive-cygwin=delorie DOT com AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

Christopher Faylor wrote on 28 October 2008 14:48:
> On Mon, Oct 27, 2008 at 01:08:16PM -0000, Dave Korn wrote:
>> John Emmas wrote on 27 October 2008 12:58:
>> 
>>> http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
>>> 
>>> This suggests sending a blank email of the following form:-
>> 
>>  I also noticed that the list-unsubscribe addresses are broken; I
>> dropped a note to the overseers' list on Friday.  However, at least for
>> me, the web interface /is/ working: read on.
> 
> They are not broken.

  They certainly are not working as described.

> You missed this part:

  I rather think I did not, since I complied with it to the letter.
 
>   "Remember that your message is being interpreted by a computer not by a
>   person so please use a blank subject and empty content in your message
>   to reduce the risk of your unsubscribe attempt being interpreted as
>   spam."

  That was *exactly* what I did in the first three of four attempts, and it
still didn't work.  You can see them here:

http://cygwin.com/ml/overseers/2008-q4/msg00024.html

  (In the fourth one I added "unsubscribe" in desparation, in case it worked
around an overly keen spam filter, but still no dice.)

> Not every message that is interpreted as spam results in a bounce
> message.

  The $list-$request@ addresses might as well be completely unfiltered,
mightn't they?

> There was also other pertinent advice before this:
>
>  "First of all, always use the automated unsubscription mechanisms...."

  That's what I was doing.  My understanding of "automated unsubscription
mechanisms" include "mailing to the list-unsubscribe address".  (The
"interpreted by a computer not by a person" wording that you quote above
supports that.)  If the advice only meant "web interface", I would have
expected it to only say "web interface".

> Again, if you are having problems unsubscribing do not send them here.  

  I didn't.  I sent them to overseers.  When /someone else/ mentioned it here
I responded in order to direct them to the right place and let them know the
problem was in hand.

> Follow the instructions from the FAQ.

  So far you haven't shown where I deviated from them by so much as an inch.


PS.  Welcome back, hope you enjoyed your holiday! :-P~~~

    cheers,
      DaveK
-- 
Can't think of a witty .sigline today....


--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -