X-Recipient:	archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
X-Spam-Check-By:	sourceware.org
Message-ID:	<48FCC021.2A659850@dessent.net>
Date:	Mon, 20 Oct 2008 10:30:09 -0700
From:	Brian Dessent <brian AT dessent DOT net>
X-Mailer:	Mozilla 4.79 [en] (Windows NT 5.0; U)
MIME-Version:	1.0
To:	"cygwin AT cygwin DOT com" <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
Subject:	Re: Compile time Local Cygwin vs. VMware session on same system
References:	<D1CE63BB766844448B4A8CDC82658DE4020CB9A3E0 AT NALASEXMB03 DOT na DOT qualcomm DOT com>
X-IsSubscribed:	yes
Reply-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id:	<cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

"Manning, Sid" wrote:

> I was surprised to see that I could compile much faster under VMware than on Cygwin on the same host.

Why is that surprising?  Cygwin and VMware work on entirely different
principles.  Plus your chosen benchmark essentially tests the two
slowest aspects of Cygwin, process creation and filesystem access, both
of which are particularly fast on Linux.

Brian

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -