X-Recipient:	archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
X-Spam-Check-By:	sourceware.org
Date:	Thu, 18 Sep 2008 13:46:43 +0200
From:	Paul-Kenji Cahier <pkc AT F1-Photo DOT com>
X-Mailer:	The Bat! (v4.0.16.2) Professional
Reply-To:	Paul-Kenji Cahier <pkc AT F1-Photo DOT com>
Message-ID:	<1542859895.20080918134643@F1-Photo.com>
To:	Jay <jay DOT krell AT cornell DOT edu>, cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re[2]: Slow fork issue - Win x64
In-Reply-To:	<COL101-W1796553906F07DD5A0E579E64F0@phx.gbl>
References:	<1221716111 DOT 21095 DOT ezmlm AT cygwin DOT com> <COL101-W1796553906F07DD5A0E579E64F0 AT phx DOT gbl>
MIME-Version:	1.0
X-IsSubscribed:	yes
Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id:	<cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Unsubscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-unsubscribe-archive-cygwin=delorie DOT com AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

>  but maybe merely bringing up AMD64 up to the speed of x86 would suffice. 

I think that that would be already a great progress... I see no reason why amd64
windows' would be so much slower.
Another test on a vista 64 showed speeds around 7-8.

If anyone has any idea what to do to speed up up to the 32bit os' speed, I'd
be glad to hear about it.

Thanks,

Paul


--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -