| delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
| X-Recipient: | archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com |
| X-Spam-Check-By: | sourceware.org |
| From: | "Dave Korn" <dave DOT korn AT artimi DOT com> |
| To: | <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com> |
| References: | <announce.001001c91336$91e70d10$9601a8c0 AT CAM DOT ARTIMI DOT COM> <48C8FE4D DOT 1090103 AT users DOT sourceforge DOT net> <013401c9140b$22b569c0$9601a8c0 AT CAM DOT ARTIMI DOT COM> <48CA1F81 DOT 3070802 AT users DOT sourceforge DOT net> |
| Subject: | RE: [ANNOUNCEMENT] New experimental package: gcc4-4.3.0-1 |
| Date: | Fri, 12 Sep 2008 10:51:33 +0100 |
| Message-ID: | <019201c914bd$23d02db0$9601a8c0@CAM.ARTIMI.COM> |
| MIME-Version: | 1.0 |
| X-Mailer: | Microsoft Office Outlook 11 |
| In-Reply-To: | <48CA1F81.3070802@users.sourceforge.net> |
| Mailing-List: | contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm |
| List-Id: | <cygwin.cygwin.com> |
| List-Unsubscribe: | <mailto:cygwin-unsubscribe-archive-cygwin=delorie DOT com AT cygwin DOT com> |
| List-Subscribe: | <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com> |
| List-Archive: | <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/> |
| List-Post: | <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com> |
| List-Help: | <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs> |
| Sender: | cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com |
| Mail-Followup-To: | cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
| Delivered-To: | mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
Yaakov (Cygwin Ports) wrote on 12 September 2008 08:51:
>> Because I didn't use libtool to do it. I think Aaron's patch to build
>> libgcc shared from upstream does it properly, so I'll be adopting it if
>> I can, otherwise I'll just crudely bodge it in.
>
> Since the name of the libgcc dll is manually specified in
> gcc/config/i386/{cygwin.h,t-cygwin}, isn't it just a matter of changing
> those to cyggcc_s-1.dll? Or am I missing something?
I just don't know whether or not the version is embedded in the generated
DLL anywhere other than the name, so far.
>> Didn't look at fortran and objc.
>
> Presuming that F95 and ObjC/ObjC++ don't have the problem with overrides
> that C++ has, it should be as simple as adding the -no-undefined flag.
I would anticipate so.
cheers,
DaveK
--
Can't think of a witty .sigline today....
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
| webmaster | delorie software privacy |
| Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |