delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
X-Recipient: | archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com |
X-Spam-Check-By: | sourceware.org |
From: | "Dave Korn" <dave DOT korn AT artimi DOT com> |
To: | <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com> |
References: | <announce.001001c91336$91e70d10$9601a8c0 AT CAM DOT ARTIMI DOT COM> <ga9hns$e1t$1 AT ger DOT gmane DOT org> <011b01c913f2$be6456b0$9601a8c0 AT CAM DOT ARTIMI DOT COM> <gabjfm$as8$1 AT ger DOT gmane DOT org> |
Subject: | RE: [ANNOUNCEMENT] New experimental package: gcc4-4.3.0-1 |
Date: | Thu, 11 Sep 2008 18:36:04 +0100 |
Message-ID: | <014f01c91434$dd86e570$9601a8c0@CAM.ARTIMI.COM> |
MIME-Version: | 1.0 |
X-Mailer: | Microsoft Office Outlook 11 |
In-Reply-To: | <gabjfm$as8$1@ger.gmane.org> |
Mailing-List: | contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm |
List-Id: | <cygwin.cygwin.com> |
List-Unsubscribe: | <mailto:cygwin-unsubscribe-archive-cygwin=delorie DOT com AT cygwin DOT com> |
List-Subscribe: | <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com> |
List-Archive: | <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/> |
List-Post: | <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com> |
List-Help: | <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs> |
Sender: | cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com |
Mail-Followup-To: | cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
Delivered-To: | mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
X-MIME-Autoconverted: | from quoted-printable to 8bit by delorie.com id m8BHak16016475 |
René Berber wrote on 11 September 2008 18:11: >>> Has anyone tested it? >> >> Well, yeah :) > > That much I knew, it's the normal way gcc builds itself. I also did before-and-after regression tests, and spent some time investigating and solving regressions which involved recompiling the testsuite cases manually and looking at what was generated, and I tested the packaged version by uploading it to my private mirror and installing from there and using it to rebuild the gmp package and run the tests without any failures. So I was /reasonably/ confident that it wasn't completely dead in the water, but of course it is always possible that I screwed up hideously. > Bingo! I have an old gcc 4.0.2 under /usr/local, that probably is the > problem... changing PATH wasn't enough, strange. > > At least now I know what I'm looking for. Thanks! And at least now I know that I haven't screwed up hideously. Thanks! cheers, DaveK -- Can't think of a witty .sigline today.... -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |