X-Recipient:	archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
X-Spam-Check-By:	sourceware.org
From:	"Dave Korn" <dave DOT korn AT artimi DOT com>
To:	<cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
References:	<f79359b60809100617h387d3c32obe1b5300601df74f AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <002001c91348$edaf1fe0$9601a8c0 AT CAM DOT ARTIMI DOT COM> <f79359b60809100651o601fcexc328ff52d45fc49f AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
Subject:	RE: Fortran 90/95 compiler
Date:	Wed, 10 Sep 2008 15:20:01 +0100
Message-ID:	<003901c91350$4fb938e0$9601a8c0@CAM.ARTIMI.COM>
MIME-Version:	1.0
X-Mailer:	Microsoft Office Outlook 11
In-Reply-To:	<f79359b60809100651o601fcexc328ff52d45fc49f@mail.gmail.com>
Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id:	<cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Unsubscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-unsubscribe-archive-cygwin=delorie DOT com AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

Gustavo Seabra wrote on 10 September 2008 14:51:

> On Wed, Sep 10, 2008 at 9:27 AM, Dave Korn wrote:
>> Gustavo Seabra wrote on 10 September 2008 14:17:
>> 
>>> Hi everyone,
>>> 
>>> I was just wondering why there is no Fortran 90/95 compiler in Cygwin,
                                                 ^^^^^ doh!

>>  Actually, there is one[*]; it just doesn't have the word 'fortran' in
>> the name (but it does in the package description):

>> [*] - Actually, there are two[**]:

> Those two apparently only include old (Fortran77) compilers, so they
> don't actually count ;-)

  Sorry!  Not a fortran-head, didn't spot the significance of the version you
specified.


>> [*] - Actually, now there are three, but the latest one is highly
>> experimental: http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-announce/2008-09/msg00004.html
>> http://cygwin.com/packages/gcc4-fortran/
> 
> OK, now I see... this one actually seems to include 'gfortran' in it,
> which supports Fortran95 standards, so there's actually one. (Or
> should we say 0.90, since it's 'experimental' ;-) )

  Well yeh... but then again it's gcc4: it's a compiler-and-a-half!

    cheers,
      DaveK
-- 
Can't think of a witty .sigline today....


--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -