X-Recipient:	archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
X-Spam-Check-By:	sourceware.org
Message-ID:	<b609cb3b0809090608o59c6e5cdk5863be59ec3cb415@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Tue, 9 Sep 2008 09:08:50 -0400
From:	NightStrike <nightstrike AT gmail DOT com>
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: Difficulty building gcc 4.3.2 under i386-pc-cygwin
In-Reply-To:	<20080908223255.GA18802@ednor.casa.cgf.cx>
MIME-Version:	1.0
References:	<1220909037 DOT 6401 DOT ezmlm AT cygwin DOT com> <COL101-W55107222466828EA3A4B5FE6550 AT phx DOT gbl> <20080908214759 DOT GA18503 AT ednor DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx> <028301c91200$a6a37540$9601a8c0 AT CAM DOT ARTIMI DOT COM> <20080908223255 DOT GA18802 AT ednor DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx>
X-IsSubscribed:	yes
Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id:	<cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Unsubscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-unsubscribe-archive-cygwin=delorie DOT com AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

On Mon, Sep 8, 2008 at 6:32 PM, Christopher Faylor
<cgf-use-the-mailinglist-please AT cygwin DOT com> wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 08, 2008 at 11:17:16PM +0100, Dave Korn wrote:
>>Christopher Faylor wrote on 08 September 2008 22:48:
>>
>>> On Mon, Sep 08, 2008 at 09:43:37PM +0000, Jay wrote:
>>>> You can build gcc 4.3.1 and 4.3.2 just fine from the existing Cygwin gcc
>>>> 3.x package.
>>>>
>>>> The error also /appeared/ to have the object directory under the source
>>>> directory.  Don't do that.
>>>
>>> Huh?  There's no reason not to do this.  I do it all of the time.
>>
>>  It is unsupported:
>>
>>http://gcc.gnu.org/install/configure.html
>>
>>"... building where objdir is a subdirectory of srcdir is unsupported."
>
> What's that?  An actual reference to a definitive source?  Do you think
> that will ever catch on?
>
> I have been building gcc like that (and also in a completely separate
> directory) for many years, but if this officially unsanctioned then,
> nevermind.

Maybe it's time to officially sanction it, perhaps?

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -