X-Recipient:	archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
X-Spam-Check-By:	sourceware.org
X-Authority-Analysis:	v=1.0 c=1 a=w_pzkKWiAAAA:8 a=xe8BsctaAAAA:8 a=aDlhq6M52uSFWsQXvLwA:9 a=DxzTiUE2upD8_i3oQuwA:7 a=kd1SAMQu4keO0C_2K-Ds2wjTJ_4A:4 a=eDFNAWYWrCwA:10 a=rPt6xJ-oxjAA:10
Message-ID:	<48B9BABF.2020105@byu.net>
Date:	Sat, 30 Aug 2008 15:25:19 -0600
From:	Eric Blake <ebb9 AT byu DOT net>
User-Agent:	Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8.1.16) Gecko/20080708 Thunderbird/2.0.0.16 Mnenhy/0.7.5.666
MIME-Version:	1.0
To:	Phil Smith <phil AT voltage DOT com>
CC:	"cygwin AT cygwin DOT com" <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
Subject:	Re: Probably stupid make question
References:	<B870629719727B4BA82A6C06A31C291207429E06EA AT hqmailsvr01 DOT voltage DOT com> <48B706FB DOT 4CAE7693 AT dessent DOT net> <20080828203234 DOT GB17369 AT ednor DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx> <B870629719727B4BA82A6C06A31C291207429E0893 AT hqmailsvr01 DOT voltage DOT com> <2A9FABB3664AF8459CBADA1CE4E4024642D52EA2B1 AT DF-MASTIFF-MSG DOT exchange DOT corp DOT microsoft DOT com> <20080830195510 DOT GB20923 AT ednor DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx> <B870629719727B4BA82A6C06A31C291207429E091B AT hqmailsvr01 DOT voltage DOT com> <48B9B43E DOT 1050407 AT byu DOT net> <B870629719727B4BA82A6C06A31C291207429E091C AT hqmailsvr01 DOT voltage DOT com>
In-Reply-To:	<B870629719727B4BA82A6C06A31C291207429E091C@hqmailsvr01.voltage.com>
X-IsSubscribed:	yes
Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id:	<cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

According to Phil Smith on 8/30/2008 3:06 PM:
> But you've (seemingly inadvertently?) answered the question, 

Nope, my reply was not inadvertent (I mentioned quoting on purpose).

> 
> P.S. And no, I'm not going to get into a top-posting vs. inline discussion

We mention http://cygwin.com/acronyms/#TOFU for a reason, because that's
what we prefer on this list.  By top-posting this comment, you've gone and
done exactly what you said you weren't going to do, so you're not
representing yourself very well.

> I did remove your email address below, however, including the raw copy in your sig...

Thanks.  However, that raw copy is something I chose.
http://cygwin.com/acronyms/#PCYMTNQREAIYR states: "Of course, there may be
other raw e-mail addresses in messages, e.g., in signatures, but that's
the choice of the person sending the message."

We only ask that you take time to munge addresses in headers, without
worrying about sigs (although, if your mailer is truly RFC-compliant, any
text after a line containing only "-- ", such as my sig, would be
automatically omitted from your reply).

- --
Don't work too hard, make some time for fun as well!

Eric Blake             ebb9 AT byu DOT net
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (Cygwin)
Comment: Public key at home.comcast.net/~ericblake/eblake.gpg
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iEYEARECAAYFAki5ur8ACgkQ84KuGfSFAYDEUQCgsvUbXsEU+xAyFlvNAU7kGHWd
oLsAoMvdGwjZTNlDtTb8clMbmEZV6fkW
=nWjl
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -