delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
X-Recipient: | archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com |
X-Spam-Check-By: | sourceware.org |
From: | Phil Smith <phil AT voltage DOT com> |
To: | "cygwin AT cygwin DOT com" <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com> |
Date: | Thu, 28 Aug 2008 16:46:11 -0700 |
Subject: | RE: Probably stupid make question |
Message-ID: | <B870629719727B4BA82A6C06A31C291207429E0773@hqmailsvr01.voltage.com> |
References: | <B870629719727B4BA82A6C06A31C291207429E06EA AT hqmailsvr01 DOT voltage DOT com> <48B706FB DOT 4CAE7693 AT dessent DOT net> |
In-Reply-To: | <48B706FB.4CAE7693@dessent.net> |
Accept-Language: | en-US |
acceptlanguage: | en-US |
MIME-Version: | 1.0 |
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: | vendor=fsecure engine=4.65.7161:2.4.4,1.2.40,4.0.164 definitions=2008-08-29_01:2008-08-28,2008-08-29,2008-08-28 signatures=0 |
X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: | rule=notspam policy=default score=0 spamscore=0 ipscore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx engine=3.1.0-0805090000 definitions=main-0808280156 |
X-IsSubscribed: | yes |
Mailing-List: | contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm |
List-Id: | <cygwin.cygwin.com> |
List-Subscribe: | <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com> |
List-Archive: | <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/> |
List-Post: | <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com> |
List-Help: | <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs> |
Sender: | cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com |
Mail-Followup-To: | cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
Delivered-To: | mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
X-MIME-Autoconverted: | from quoted-printable to 8bit by delorie.com id m7SNlnMC012848 |
Well, I said it was probably stupid :-) Ok, I'll dig into it some more. It seemed worth asking in case everyone said "Hey, dip****, use the -XYZ option". ...phsiii -----Original Message----- From: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com [mailto:cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com] On Behalf Of Brian Dessent Sent: Thursday, August 28, 2008 4:14 PM To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: Probably stupid make question Phil Smith wrote: > We're perverting CMake and Cygwin make to use a cross-compiler for z/OS (IBM mainframe). We've beaten it mostly into submission, but are hitting an issue with definitions being passed. Cygwin make seems to be passing them in the format: > -Dvarname value > rather than: > -Dvarname=value > and the cross-compiler doesn't like that much. Some discussion with more *IX-savvy friends suggests that the "blank" format is older, and is deprecated due to ambiguity (does "-Dvarname abc.c xyz.c" mean "set varname to abc.c and compile xyz.c", or "set varname to 1 and compile abc.c and xyz.c"?). I think you're going to have to be more specific, such as providing a testcase that reproduces the problem. This must be due to some aspect of cmake, because there's nothing in plain make (AFAIK) that has anything to do with how -D or any other parameter is passed to any tool -- make executes commands exactly as written in the Makefile, no more no less. -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |