delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi   search  
Mail Archives: cygwin/2008/08/28/16:33:33

X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Date: Thu, 28 Aug 2008 16:32:35 -0400
From: Christopher Faylor <cgf-use-the-mailinglist-please AT cygwin DOT com>
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject: Re: Probably stupid make question
Message-ID: <20080828203234.GB17369@ednor.casa.cgf.cx>
Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
References: <B870629719727B4BA82A6C06A31C291207429E06EA AT hqmailsvr01 DOT voltage DOT com> <48B706FB DOT 4CAE7693 AT dessent DOT net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <48B706FB.4CAE7693@dessent.net>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.16 (2007-06-09)
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id: <cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:cygwin-unsubscribe-archive-cygwin=delorie DOT com AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

On Thu, Aug 28, 2008 at 01:13:47PM -0700, Brian Dessent wrote:
>Phil Smith wrote:
>>We're perverting CMake and Cygwin make to use a cross-compiler for z/OS
>>(IBM mainframe).  We've beaten it mostly into submission, but are
>>hitting an issue with definitions being passed.  Cygwin make seems to
>>be passing them in the format:
>>
>>         -Dvarname value
>>
>> rather than:
>>
>>         -Dvarname=value
>>
>>and the cross-compiler doesn't like that much.  Some discussion with
>>more *IX-savvy friends suggests that the "blank" format is older, and
>>is deprecated due to ambiguity (does "-Dvarname abc.c xyz.c" mean "set
>>varname to abc.c and compile xyz.c", or "set varname to 1 and compile
>>abc.c and xyz.c"?).
>
>I think you're going to have to be more specific, such as providing a
>testcase that reproduces the problem.  This must be due to some aspect
>of cmake, because there's nothing in plain make (AFAIK) that has
>anything to do with how -D or any other parameter is passed to any tool
>-- make executes commands exactly as written in the Makefile, no more
>no less.

As the make maintainer, let me say:  What he said.

cgf

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -


  webmaster     delorie software   privacy  
  Copyright © 2019   by DJ Delorie     Updated Jul 2019