delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
X-Recipient: | archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com |
X-Spam-Check-By: | sourceware.org |
Message-ID: | <b609cb3b0808221100v329c65b9ldc0f0c716978a405@mail.gmail.com> |
Date: | Fri, 22 Aug 2008 14:00:58 -0400 |
From: | NightStrike <nightstrike AT gmail DOT com> |
To: | cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
Subject: | Compiling gcc for cygwin |
MIME-Version: | 1.0 |
X-IsSubscribed: | yes |
Mailing-List: | contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm |
List-Id: | <cygwin.cygwin.com> |
List-Subscribe: | <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com> |
List-Archive: | <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/> |
List-Post: | <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com> |
List-Help: | <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs> |
Sender: | cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com |
Mail-Followup-To: | cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
Delivered-To: | mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
I figured I would take the liberty of informing anyone from the cygwin community that might not be on the gcc mailing lists. After a recent merge of the "tuples" branch of gcc to the mainline gcc, gcc stopped being compilable by the 3.4.4 compiler that comes with cygwin. There are two bugs for this: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37086 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37091 They have both been closed as invalid. If cygwin ever wants to be able to support newer gcc compilers, something needs to be done in this area. There are several options, and I am not advocating one over another. I am instead just making sure that the cygwin community is informed of the current state of gcc 4.4. -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |